16 questions linked to/from Asked again to review a paper, when the authors don't wish to modify it
How to deal with rote "publication shopping"? [duplicate]
I spend a lot of time peer-reviewing paper submissions to conferences, workshops, and journals in my field. Sometimes I end up getting assigned a paper that I had already rejected from another venue. ...
I got the same referee report from two different journals
My coauthor and I submitted our article for publication to one of the best journals in our field. After a long time of review, we got a rejection decision by the editor based on the referee report ...
What to do if a colleague is reviewing an unchanged paper that has been rejected before on my recommendation?
Around a year ago, I reviewed a paper for a journal. The originality of the paper was questionable, and content and presentation were severely lacking throughout. Consequently, both another reviewer ...
Can I tell the authors I was a referee for the same paper for another journal?
I have reviewed a paper for a journal, which I rejected. I wrote a 3 page report with major and minor comments. A week later, I received an invitation to review the same paper in another journal. The ...
How should I decline a referee request for the paper which I refereed before?
I have received a referee request for a paper that I refereed and rejected a few months ago. I would like to decline the request because although the recent journal's rank is lower than the previous ...
Should referees assume that authors will see the full report if their paper is rejected?
I have now more than once had the following series of experiences as a referee of mathematics papers: Elite Journal A sends me a paper. I find some problems with it, some small and some large, and ...
Is there anything that has been tried to stop publication shopping
I find it very annoying as a reviewer when I get asked to review a paper several times as it gets submitted to different journals/conferences or, worse still, I help send it to the reject pile only to ...
Author did not make the major changes asked during the review process
I recently had my first paper to review. Since it was the first one, I took great care to be as constructive as possible and to formulate correct and accurate questions / suggestions. At that time, I ...
Resubmitting elsewhere without any key change when a paper is rejected
While not necessarily being an expert, I have extensive experience in biomedical scholarly publishing as author (>500 scholarly papers published) and reviewer (>1000 manuscripts reviewed). Most of my ...
Does the reviewer ever get the same manuscript twice?
Consider the scenario where an author sends his paper to Journal A. Journal A then sends the paper to reviewer X and the reviewer rejects the papers. After rejection, the author send his paper to ...
Ignoring referee reports [duplicate]
Let's consider the following situation: Author A submits a paper to a journal. Referee B writes a critical referee report and recommends rejection. Author A then resubmits the same paper to another ...
Can it be unfair when the same referee reviews a manuscript again at a different journal?
I know it is fairly common to review the same paper twice. However, I want to ask whether this can be unfair to the authors. I recently had a paper rejected in two very prestigious applied math ...
If I refereed a paper at one journal (and it was rejected) should I referee it again when it's sent to another journal?
A couple months ago I refereed a paper for one journal. Due to a number of factors, I recommended that it not be published in that particular journal, and gave the author a bunch of comments on how ...
Studies over how noisy is it to accept/reject submissions
This year, the NIPS 2014 conference did an interesting experiment: conference chairs duplicated 10% of the submissions (170 papers) and sent them to two different groups of reviewers. The result: 25.9%...
Should I accept to review a re-submission to a different conference
(My field is Computer Science, where conference publications are the norm.) I reviewed a paper submitted to conference A six months ago. The paper was borderline, and was eventually rejected. I wrote ...