I intend on taking the GRE but I haven't had the time to study much and so now I feel I am facing the option of either

  • Taking the GRE anyway, most likely getting very unimpressive scores and applying to academic programs with these scores, or
  • Cutting my losses and applying for programs the next time they announce applications (which, in some cases, is a year from now).

Is it possible to apply with my first scores as some sort of "provisional" score and inform them that I will be re-taking the rest soon? How much does a "bad first time, better second time" affect how admissions reviewers see applicants? In the case that extra background information would be helpful, I am a non-traditional student who already has a (short) record of research experience.

  • I am in a similar situation, though I decided to take it anyway. Now I am wondering if its even worth while studying for it more and send additional scores or just forget it until decisions are out and instead focus on my research position I currently hold...and if I don't get in anywhere I want instead just then only study for the GRE again... – Pinocchio Nov 28 '17 at 22:22

Honestly, the GRE scores are perhaps the most useless part of the application record. Good scores tell me that someone speaks English well, and is capable of basic mathematics. A bad score could just be a signpost of having a bad day, or perhaps some issues with English that don't necessarily translate into being a bad student or a bad researcher. (Just about the only thing GRE scores tend to correlate with in grad school is the performance in first-year classes!)

If you do have replacement scores, you can definitely send them to grad schools. They'll be considered, but they're not likely to sway a decision (unless the school has a minimum cutoff—which is possible for international students).

| improve this answer | |
  • if its the most useless then why put us through the pain of doing it and distracting us from things that actually matter? – Pinocchio Nov 28 '17 at 22:20
  • Because that's what's always been done. (Seriously. It's inertia more than anything else.) – aeismail Nov 28 '17 at 23:26
  • is there a way to motivate universities to abandon such useless traditions? Or at least the first step to motivate to stop this? – Pinocchio Nov 29 '17 at 22:38

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.