This question already has an answer here:

Many new publishers have recently appeared because of the open access model (they do not need to struggle with sale & marketing). Some of them are shady business efforts, but some have strong scientific standards and their journals are reliable.

Beall’s List of Predatory Open-Access Publishers lists unreliable publishers. Is there any resource listing reliable Open-Access journals? Such list can introduce us reputable publishers we have not come across yet.

The answer to the question "how to identify" can be found here.

marked as duplicate by Florian D'Souza, henning, aeismail Nov 3 '17 at 17:53

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • Just as you would with non-open-access publishers: Look at the editorial board, see if there is someone you know on there (if not, stop here); if yes, ask one of these people whether they are actually editors and whether the periodical can be trusted. – darij grinberg Nov 3 '17 at 16:32
  • @darijgrinberg not a reliable approach. Many big names do not care to e mentioned here and there. And many journals put their names without permission. The name of someone on the editorial board does not mean s/he is contributing to the journal's editorial process. – Googlebot Nov 3 '17 at 17:11
  • @henning I further edited the question to avoid the duplication. Hope it is close to what the OP is looking for. – Googlebot Nov 3 '17 at 17:15
  • @Googlebot: this is why I said to pick someone you know and ask her! – darij grinberg Nov 3 '17 at 19:04

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.