Morris Kline's Why The Professor Can't Teach mentions many problems in current mathematical education in university. The author said the Doctor of Arts (D.A.) in Mathematics was created to solve these problems. But I noticed that there are only three universities that have this degree in the U.S. (even in the world). They are

  1. Carnegie Mellon University,
  2. University of Illinois at Chicago and
  3. Idaho State University.

I even heard an associate professor in CMU said they want to halt this degree. So my question is, has the D.A. degree in math been taken seriously?

  • 6
    Seems like this is answered here. – ff524 Oct 19 '17 at 5:13
  • 4
    Kline's book is quite old, so it cannot possibly treat "problems in current mathematical education". A lot has changed in the 40 years since it was published. – Dan Fox Oct 19 '17 at 7:15
  • 4
    Note that teaching is not only standing in front of an audience and writing things on the blackboard. It also includes the supervision of bachelor/master/PhD theses, the design of appropriate problems for them, etc. I would personally prefer a professor who is bad at presenting (I can still read some textbooks in the worst case) over an advisor who has no idea about research... – Dirk Oct 19 '17 at 9:21
  • 4
    I found an article Why We Need to Remember the Doctor-of-Arts Degree in which it says " ... we should remember that during this time of prosperity there was an actual shortage of professors. The D.A. was envisioned as the solution to that shortage...." – scaaahu Oct 19 '17 at 15:04
  • 5
    By "taken seriously", do you mean if the degree enables holders to find gainful employment, or if it's a trendy thing to tell people about at a party, or what? – Nat Mar 20 '18 at 8:37

If the NSF (National Science Foundation) doesn't recognize a degree as a Research Doctorate, for whatever reason, the holder's opportunities will be limited. For example, most colleges and universities in the US expect faculty to do at least some research at some level. The required quality varies widely.

Tenure in the US is determined by faculty committees. If one or more members of your committee doesn't accept the quality of your degree for whatever reason you will fare poorly in attaining tenure.

Finally, when you apply for grants you are expected to list your "highest" degree. If a "doctorate" isn't recognized as a Research Degree by NSF, you might need to list an MS as your highest degree. This can be devastating if you don't expect it.

For the D.A. degree, NSF recognition as a Research Doctorate ended in 2003.

Note that the above is directed to anyone who would want to pursue this degree now or in the future. Consider the above issues. However, it says nothing about the quality of the people holding the degree. Many were unfairly left stranded, unfortunately, by NSFs change of designation.


So my question is, has the D.A. degree in math been taken seriously?

How seriously the degree is taken is more likely to be influenced by which university granted it than the name of the actual degree. This is especially true for uncommon degrees like a D.A. in Math

I'm going to assume you're considering a D.A. in math and are asking to find programs you'd be interested in.

I would not put very much stock in the name of the degree for the following reasons

1) The name and the umbrella college each school inhabits in a university is usually influenced by politics.

The likely scenario is when the school was created, there was some in-fighting to get the shiny new building and the new resources that school would bring. For some reason, it ended up in the Arts department. For example, the MIT Media Lab is part of the Department of Architecture, even though it has little if anything to do with it.

2) Even if the program was inspired by this book, the founding professors have likely retired or are near retirement due to age.

It's a pretty old book, and the idea hasn't seemed to gain much traction. Even if the programs were originally designed to focus on teaching, new faculty have likely been hired and put their spin on it. I highly doubt any program at a university shares that much with it's 40 (or more) year old counterpart.

3) Some professors research effective teaching methods in their own departments whatever the degree is called

Schools such as Rose-Hulman are almost completely teaching focused and award tenure based on excellence in teaching.


A doctorate is a doctorate. But where you get it matters: Note that two of the three are highly regarded 'name' Universities.

Universities prize research over teaching; DoA was devised to solve a teaching shortage that no longer exists. The ratio of people with doctorates to University positions is very high. To get a tenure track university position, you need to publish. "Math is a young man's game". If you don't publish something good before 30, you never will.

That said, my friend noted that his philosophy professors at a state University were all from Harvard, and very good at teaching. His math professors were all from low-tier schools and spoke terrible English. If you take a DoA, you must learn to teach really really well.

Oh, and if you are truly curious: Look up someone who has one on LinkedIn, and pay the InMail cost to contact them.

  • 3
    While holders of professional doctorates may disagree, a research doctorate is a very different beast for other doctoral degrees. – StrongBad May 8 '18 at 23:54
  • 2
    Now I see why everyone commented, rather than putting an answer. – Mox May 10 '18 at 17:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.