My question has different emphases from Why are recommendation letters highly relied upon?.
As we know, the letter of recommendations are heavily relied in the process of university/graduate school applications and job market. Sometimes it is considered the most important part of the application. Sometimes if a referee wants to strongly recommend someone, s/he may even directly makes a phone call to certain departments/professors.
However, as we know, the quality and importance of recommendation letters depends largely on the subjective opinions and the reputations of the referees. As a result, the system of recommendation letters sometimes encourages young scholars to spend more (and perhaps unnecessary) time using strategies to gain the favor of professional scholars (I believe there are clever ways for average students to "demonstrate" to the professors that they are strong...) or spend less time in communication to avoid bad opinions(if you can't show people that you are smart, then you'd better talk less and try not to show people that you are stupid).
Meanwhile, writing letters seems to be a heavy burden of professors. You might want to argue that this is part of their job, but shouldn't they be given more time on their research and teaching? I heard some professors write dozens of letters every year which costs them a lot of time (excluding the time for communication with applicants).
My question is, is the letter of recommendation really an indispensable part of academic application processes? Can "objective" things like GPA(well, "transcripts" or "courses and grades" might be a more accurate measurement), test and competition scores, publications alone provide enough information to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of applicants?
Aside: I don't know much about the application of professional positions (postdoc and tenure-track positions). However, for university/graduate school applications, can we simply raise the difficulty of standard tests(for the information of those who think SAT and GRE general and even subject tests are too easy) to set the applicants apart from each other better? I heard in China, Ph.D. applicants need to take qualifying exams BEFORE being considered.