2

Here is the scenario, can you give me your idea about 2 things?

A conference paper is published, you submit it to ArXiv. You journalize the paper (with a modified title and added material) and publish it.

A) Should you get a new arXiv link for it?

Let's assume you get a new arXiv link for it.

B) Can you update the fist ArXiv submission and indicate in the first page, in the footnote, that the complete work has been published in a journal and is available in the second arXiv link?

  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about the operation of specific sites are outside of our scope and should be addressed to the help system of the website. – aeismail Sep 22 '17 at 3:30
  • You do not need a new link. You simply update the existing paper (if needed) and add the journal and is available outside of arXiv. – aeismail Sep 22 '17 at 3:30
  • 4
    I think arXiv is so widely used that best practices for its use are a significant part of publishing one's research (in relevant fields). I vote to reopen. – Nate Eldredge Sep 22 '17 at 3:47
  • I think this question is mostly answered by Uploading a revised version of published journal article on arXiv. – scaaahu Sep 22 '17 at 4:14
  • This question is not really a duplicate of the one linked by @scaahu, and the academic best practise of how to use the arXiv is certainly on-topic here. The question should be reopened. – Arno Sep 22 '17 at 10:05