2

Here is the scenario, can you give me your idea about 2 things?

A conference paper is published, you submit it to ArXiv. You journalize the paper (with a modified title and added material) and publish it.

A) Should you get a new arXiv link for it?

Let's assume you get a new arXiv link for it.

B) Can you update the fist ArXiv submission and indicate in the first page, in the footnote, that the complete work has been published in a journal and is available in the second arXiv link?

closed as off-topic by aeismail Sep 22 '17 at 3:30

  • This question does not appear to be about academia within the scope defined in the help center.
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because questions about the operation of specific sites are outside of our scope and should be addressed to the help system of the website. – aeismail Sep 22 '17 at 3:30
  • You do not need a new link. You simply update the existing paper (if needed) and add the journal and is available outside of arXiv. – aeismail Sep 22 '17 at 3:30
  • 4
    I think arXiv is so widely used that best practices for its use are a significant part of publishing one's research (in relevant fields). I vote to reopen. – Nate Eldredge Sep 22 '17 at 3:47
  • I think this question is mostly answered by Uploading a revised version of published journal article on arXiv. – scaaahu Sep 22 '17 at 4:14
  • This question is not really a duplicate of the one linked by @scaahu, and the academic best practise of how to use the arXiv is certainly on-topic here. The question should be reopened. – Arno Sep 22 '17 at 10:05