I know nothing about the bureaucracy of the academic world when writing papers but I sometimes need or enjoy to read academic papers.

Usually all the papers I've read were written either by professors or by reasearchers (I'm guessing PhDs). Some papers were written by people working at Google and they were PhDs too.

My question is: can anyone write a paper or is some minimum level of education (say a PhD for instance) required? Of course I'm not asking if a persone can wake up tomorrow and write a paper on quantum physics without knowing anything at all of physics.

EDIT: when I said "write", what I meant was having the paper published. Sorry!


In principle: Yes, of course!

No journal I know has a rule that requires a minimum level of education or a specific affiliation. But in order to be accepted for a journal with reasonable reputation, there are several requirements:

  • Contribution: With more education (not necessarily a higher degree) it gets easier to provide a better contribution. As you said, just waking up with a great idea without even knowing the fundamentals of the field of research before is unlikely.

  • Novelty: For an external person it is hard to decide if he has really found something new or he was just reinventing the wheel. That is much easier if you are part of the research community. That does not necessarily require any affiliation, but for example the regular participation at conferences and workshops.

  • Experience: You need experience in many areas to write a good paper. A lot of (if not most) papers are rejected not because of bad ideas, but because of wrong experimental setups, wrong application of statistical methods, ugly looking plots that do not provide confidence intervals ... and most importantly because the paper was not written in a convincing way. You can not learn these things by just reading a book at home.

  • Time: Research requires a lot of time! If the university pays at least part of your bills you have more time to do research.

  • Money: Depending on the journal, publishing might be very expensive. With an affiliation at a university it is easier to find someone who pays for your publication.

  • Reputation: Last but not least, there are things, such as reputation of the author, that should not influence a reviewers decision, but they do at least sometimes.


In theory, yes. There are no requirements that an author needs to have an academic title or education. Neither does one have to be affiliated to a university or other form or research institute.

Practically, there are a lot of things that would make it unlikely, such as a lack of support (financial - you need to have some clue of the existing literature, which is usually obtained via university subscriptions to journals) to qualification.

The person might also have to invest some of his own money, since it is unlikely to get a research grant as a privateer.


Journals set their own criteria for determining which papers to publish, but anything that's original and advances the knowledge of the subject is generally publishable somewhere. The catch is that it's very difficult to do research outside the academic world. That difficulty varies with the field. As you mentioned, companies like Google and Microsoft regularly publish computer science papers; on the other hand, there really isn't alternative to academia for pure math research. Doing research at a company requires it to be willing to support your work, and very few companies are interested in supporting pure research. More applied research still requires companies to invest in their reseachers, and that generally requires a PhD, academic experimence, or some other bona fides.

If you're specifically interested in doing research yourself without a PhD, your best bet is probably to get involved with one of the few companies like Google or Microsoft that does publish large quantities of papers, put your name on its published papers even if it's just doing background or logistical work, and try to build up enough clout and experience to persuade the company to start letting you run research projects yourself. It's a hard sell, even with all the bona fides in place; companies are about making money, not doing research, and it's hard to spin publications as being profitable. You might have more luck at government labs, although their friendliness towards research and publications vary.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.