2

A talk was closely relevant to a problem which had no breakthrough for a long time, but the speaker didn't seem to know a recently new method which is proved be able to solve it yet. What should I do?

I was not a researcher, relative young comparing to the large amount of attendees, and this was the first time I attend an international conference all by myself. Whether the audience interacted with me or not, they could always notice me as I was the smallest person sitting in the front row (for note taking, the rest of rows didn't have table) in between old, big/tall Western professors. Not to mention my broken English.

I had asked the speaker if he knew any new method to solve the problem or not, and he said no. I think he and the audience did have an interest to hear it (I could even mention some leading names working on it), and I know that most of them didn't really care what I mention above at all, but still with that much pressure I didn't have enough confidence to say. Since the new method comes from a completely different field, it might take a couple minutes to explain it. The longer I talked the more embarrassed and tongue-tied I was. In the end I thanked him and asked no more question.

I know that everyone has their first time, but what is your advice in this exact situation? What would you do to feel relief yourself? The impact of the newfound knowledge is big, and yet I'm a non-researcher. That pressure is not an easy thing for an inexperienced person to handle.

  • 13
    In this case, chatting with the speaker one-on-one after the talk may have worked better for you. – Mad Jack Aug 13 '17 at 17:24
  • 5
    Some suggestions: 1. Work on improving your English (which is quite good anyway) - if you improve it, one reason for your lack of confidence will be eliminated. 2. Work on getting rid of your unhelpful (and incorrect as far as I can tell) "I am not a researcher" mindset. If you are attending a conference about research then you are a researcher and the speaker and other attendees want to hear what you have to say and benefit from the knowledge you bring to the event, even if you're not a "tall Western professor". 3. As @MadJack said, talk to the speaker in private at the end of the talk. – Dan Romik Aug 13 '17 at 19:04
  • 3
    If the conference has ended and you missed the opportunity to talk with the speaker after the talk, you could still send him an e-mail. You could write out information about this important new method, or you could just give a brief indication of the topic along with pointers to the relevant publications. – Andreas Blass Aug 14 '17 at 4:37
  • @DanRomik what defines a researcher? – Ooker Aug 14 '17 at 6:55
  • 4
    You don't have to be a researcher to have ideas about research. You don't have to be a researcher to ask people questions about their research. You don't have to be a researcher to give other people feedback on their research. Stop worrying about whether you're a researcher or not; it just doesn't matter. – JeffE Aug 15 '17 at 1:48
14

It's perfectly fine to use the question period to alert the speaker to other related work. As with any question, try to keep it brief: one or two sentences. I agree that a "couple minutes" is too long. Here are some sample phrasings.

There is a recent paper by Jones and Smith on reticulated splines, in which they propose a method to solve the trolley problem. Would this help to resolve the issue you mentioned in your talk?

Are you aware of the recent paper by Jones and Smith which gives a solution to the trolley problem? This seems like it might helpful in answering your question of whether splines can be reticulated.

You mentioned that you need a solution to the trolley problem. There is a recent paper by Jones and Smith which solves this problem using the method of reticulated splines. Does that seem likely to be workable in this case?

It is a good idea to mention the names of the authors - partly to give them credit, and partly so that the speaker or other audience members can look up the work later.

Try to resist the urge to explain the related work in detail; the question period is not the time for that. If there are significant aspects of the paper that are very relevant (special techniques, limitations, etc), you can mention them briefly (again, one or two sentences). Otherwise, you can certainly approach the speaker after the talk is over, during a coffee break, etc, for further discussion.

  • 8
    This is all true (and I upvoted it). I did want to add: you don't have to ask a question in "open court" if you don't want to. If you feel anxious asking the question and/or you feel like the question could likely lead to significantly deflating the speaker, it might be better to bring it up privately soon after the talk. – Pete L. Clark Aug 14 '17 at 15:46
  • I've always know how questions should be asked, but didn't realize it could be so true – Ooker Aug 15 '17 at 8:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.