Plagiarism software will not detect assignments that use Spinbot or other paraphrasing software. How do you prove a student is doing so?
-
12I know the word "spinbot" only in the sense that a character in a game keeps executing a spinning movement. Is the word used in a wider sense now, as well?– O. R. MapperCommented Jun 22, 2017 at 14:31
-
5@O.R.Mapper there are sites (for example spinbot.com) provide this "service" as a way to find different word choices for your text. They spin it many different ways such as useful for brainstorming or for "revitalizing" old articles/blog posts for reposting. It's a smarttext application that can generate human readable content.– scrappedcolaCommented Jun 22, 2017 at 14:50
-
7As long as the spinbot isn't very good, it doesn't seem like it should be terribly difficult to spot. Of course, plagiarism is notoriously difficult to prove, but I would imagine the people using a spinbot aren't pulling from terribly obscure sources, so its not all that different than a student lazily paraphrasing.– TyberiusCommented Jun 22, 2017 at 19:19
-
4@sgr You can it yourself at spinbot.com . I don't see any thesaurus functionality, or any possibility of manual choice: there's one box to type in your source text, and another box where it spits out a paraphrase of whatever you gave it. For instance, it turned my previous sentence into: "I don't perceive any thesaurus usefulness, or any probability of manual decision: there's one box to sort in your source content, and another case where it releases a summary of whatever you gave it."– PontCommented Jun 23, 2017 at 13:17
-
5@Pont: I wouldn't worry about that one. "In likelihood hypothesis, the typical (or Gaussian) conveyance is an extremely normal nonstop likelihood circulation. Ordinary appropriations are critical in insights and are regularly utilized as a part of the normal and sociologies to speak to genuine esteemed arbitrary factors whose dispersions are not known." Pfft. (Original text: first paragraph of the wikipedia article on normal distribution.)– Disenchanted LurkerCommented Sep 14, 2017 at 8:51
|
Show 7 more comments
5 Answers
I think you would need to know the particular source text that you believe it was modified from. In that case, demonstrating identical structure ought to be sufficient: a sentence-by-sentence comparison ought to show convincingly that the exact same ideas have been used in the same order. This absolutely falls under the definition of plagiarism (whether or not it was done in an automated way by a spinbot), and provided the text is of a decent length, it would be unreasonable for the student to claim that they happened upon the same structure by coincidence.
If you don't have the original text, I'm not aware of any tools you could use to search for it - that would seem to be a very complex (though maybe not insurmountable) AI problem. But if you don't know the source text, how would you suspect it in the first place (unless you'd caught the student in the act)?
answered Jun 23, 2017 at 12:35
-
6This answer seems to boil down to "The given website does successfully and completely defeat existing tools to search for plagiarism". Commented Jun 23, 2017 at 13:52
You don't need to prove it. A mechanical paraphrase is no different from a paraphrase written by the student. What makes plagiarism is the absence of a citation. I've found that it is generally luminously clear when (undergraduate) students have copied without citation, whether paraphrased or not.
If you can recognize the original source, then paraphrase without citation is clear. If not, asking the student for more detail about the idea that the student claims as his own will generally demonstrate the misconduct. Whether you can take formal action in the latter case depends on the rules and culture of your institution.
answered Sep 14, 2017 at 13:52
-
In many universities, a coursework assessment does not allow for a viva, so there is no option of "asking" a student unless a misconduct case is filed. Commented Sep 15, 2017 at 9:50
-
3@DmitrySavostyanov I can only comment on U.S. universities, and then only on a subset, but my experience is that an allegation of academic misconduct starts with a meeting between student and professor in which the professor questions the student about the suspect material. Commented Sep 19, 2017 at 1:35
-
Rules are more strict in the UK regarding the number of assessments, so if the module descriptor says it is a coursework, a professor is not supposed to make it "a coursework and a viva", particularly for only a subset of students. Commented Sep 19, 2017 at 9:04
-
1@DmitrySavostyanov There is a difference between it being "coursework and a viva" and an interview as the first step in an academic misconduct investigation. Commented Nov 27, 2021 at 11:47
Well, a good clue would be sentences that don't actually make sense, like the classic:
“I could hear the charlatan of the ducks in the distance,” and other examples stolen from:
Unfortunately, the only way I can think of to identify this automatically would require custom-written software, and a decent amount of work. Essentially, you could take chunks of text, throw it into a spinbot repeatedly, and then see if you turn up matches. This seems like a computationally difficult problem, since you have to test (number of synonyms)^(sentence length) options - you could only do this for short sentences. Maybe it's possible to cut that down by going to more-common synonyms first. Sounds a little like a problem where testing a proposed match is a lot faster than actually finding the match. Maybe you could get some interest from folks on https://cs.stackexchange.com/ to see if defeating spinbot plagiarism is NP-Complete!
-
Nope, build a syntax tree of each sentence and do a look-up based on that tree. Requires that your corpus also be similarly processed but it's possible (and to horribly hard)– bendlCommented Dec 18, 2017 at 16:45
-
Ah, not bad, wasn't thinking too hard in my original answer. (But it requires you to have the corpus to match, which you generally don't for turnitin, etc.)– AJKCommented Dec 18, 2017 at 21:30
A method that might be useful is contextual analysis. A statement that used jargon that seems out of place, or whose meaning doesn’t tie into the larger narrative lends weight to the possibility that the words were not the authors own.
If you ever do in person reviews of papers, you can cross examine the author on his or her knowledge and intent of including the statements.
If they are able to defend themselves, then the possibility shifts from suspected plagiarism to authentic knowledge.
If not, then you’ll know.
Nevertheless, it will be up to you to determine how much time resources you want to devote to authenticating the work of your students.
Could you tell us more about your assignments, your suspicions, your students, and your grading scheme? For my answer, I'll make a simple assumption but please straighten me out if this is wrong.
I'll assume that the plagiarism problem comes up primarily because you are assigning some standard homework problems for which other students have posted solutions online. Example: http://www.amandalscott.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/Amanda-Scott-PRL-102-Final-Fall-2015.pdf. This is a homework assignment that a student submitted for a class two years ago and then uploaded to the web. Who knows why!
The assignment comes from a standard textbook. This very same assignment is given to large numbers of students across the country every semester.
If this is the type of situation you're facing, as an instructor... I think the solution lies in modifying the assignment. Then if the work submitted doesn't hang together, you grade it accordingly. Let's suppose your student tried to cobble something together based on a homework submission someone else turned in and posted on the web, for the homework problem as it appears in the textbook, which is a slightly different assignment than the one you gave. If your student learned something from the submission s/he found on the web, and then did a good job of cobbling; OR if your student did not do a very good job of cobbling -- in both cases, just grade the work the way you would normally do. Does the prose have good structure and readability? Do the ideas flow with good logic? Does the document hit the important points? Not too short, not too wordy? Etc.
answered Dec 18, 2017 at 6:34
