I submitted a paper to a special issue of a very reputed computer science journal. Now as per the original timelines, the special issue was expected to be published by this month with two cycles of revisions. However, there was an extension for a month in submission deadline.

I submitted the paper within the extended deadline and yet to receive even the reviewer comments (4 months since submission while as per timeline the period for first review was two months). During this time, the manuscript was in peer-review. It went to "Awaiting Decision" three weeks ago, but I am still to hear on any decision.

Since this is my first submission to a reputed journal, is it normal for special issues to be delayed to such an extent?

  • 1
    I had a 1 year delay few years ago.
    – The Guy
    Jun 7, 2017 at 11:42

2 Answers 2


Reviews for periodicals can drag on ... see many previous questions in this forum in that regard. It can certainly sit with the editor for a recommendation for a while. And if a special issue, one possibility is that the editor needs reviews of other submissions to make the call as to whether yours will make the cut.

If a special issue of a CS journal, I think it is common for the date not to match the official publication date. But if a magazine then they do keep to a tight schedule, at least for IEEE Computer Society (where I served as an editor in chief of a magazine). And that definitely does put pressure on the deadlines ... but submission dates and such were padded to allow for some slippage.


From my experience, special issues are rarely published on the announced date. The review process for papers submitted to the special issue should be as rigorous as for any other journal article and thus, may experience all the usual delays (referees not answering, promising a review but not delivering, contradicting reports…). The only difference is that the journal has announced a time frame for the whole process which puts a little more pressure on the handling editors. However, this does not necessarily imply that the whole process is any quicker (also note that the guest editors of a special issue may not be as experienced).

I do not know too much about the usual delays for papers in computer science, but for math, the times you describe still sound pretty short.

  • I agree: the reviewing process in computer science is often just as slow and unpredictable in timing as in math.
    – jakebeal
    Jun 7, 2017 at 10:08

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .