I sent a paper to a Springer journal. After two days the editor was assigned and after 5 days the status changed to "Reviews Completed".
Is this bad news?
Academia Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for academics and those enrolled in higher education. It only takes a minute to sign up.Sign up to join this community
Yes, it's a bad sign. If a review is completed that quickly the odds are the reviewer recommended a quick rejection. There's also a small chance the reviewer said something like "I can't understand this paper's English" in which case you might still receive a revise decision. However it's also possible that the editor invited multiple reviewers of which only the first has submitted, so it might be a while longer to a decision. If the other reviews are more positive, you might also get a revise decision.
Human error here is unlikely. The editorial management systems I've seen automatically update the status only when reviews are submitted. If the editor's making a decision without reviewers, the status never shows 'reviews complete'; it goes straight to 'decision in progress'.