I have written an essay last year, as a personal exercise. I now have a course at uni on the topic and could basically just hand in this essay now, the topic fits perfectly. I have also never submitted this essay to any other course or so.

Could I just hand in this essay, or would I violate some rules with that? Is this maybe already self-plagiarism?

  • 1
    I would rather not do that to be honest, it doesn't give the best impression. I am also not sure whether I want to hand this piece in, it would just be good to know that I could hand it in without breaking any regulations. I could then set my priorities differently, and should time get in the way I would have a safety net. May 22, 2017 at 12:00
  • 5
    Did you ask your professor? May 23, 2017 at 10:06

4 Answers 4


Could I just hand in this essay, or would I violate some rules with that?

If you wrote it as a personal exercise and it was never submitted to any course (i.e. never read), I can't see how anyone would notice the difference - provided you are right about the fact that it answers your assignment perfectly and you are not subconciously trying to make it fit into the assignment.

Should I just hand in this essay?

Aside from the rules, consider the teaching value of writing an essay (which you obviously already know, since you wrote one as a personal exercise!). If your workload allows it, you might find that re-working on that essay a year later is really instructive. Your perspective (on the content, but also on the writing level) probably changed in one year, and with the head-start of having a first version already, you could dig deeper into the subject and end up really learning a lot and producing an essay worth an amazing grade. Or, if you don't feel like reworking this one, maybe you could pick another subject altogether? The teaching goal of essays is usually to have you research a new subject; handing in your already written one, while being legal, would certainly not serve that purpose.


Could I just hand in this essay, or would I violate some rules with that?

Rules are specific to your institution, so we can't answer that for you. But I can't imagine why a rule would exist to prohibit this, and it would be very hard to implement.

Is this maybe already self-plagiarism?

No. Self-plagiarism is about claiming credit more than once for the same piece of work. If you've not submitted it anywhere before, you're fine.

  • 2
    Not only the institution. It might vary by professor or even by course.
    – jpmc26
    May 22, 2017 at 23:22
  • I would consider an institution that considers a first-time submission to be invalid only because OP had on their own initiative already done that before (without "cashing in on it") an institution that does not value initiative, independent thinking, and discipline - in short, an institution that does not deserve OP's presence there. Sep 15, 2021 at 14:52

Many institutions include in their definitions of plagiarism something like:

submitting a paper as original work in one course when the paper has already received credit in another course (unless prearranged with the professor).

(The above is from my own institution's Honor Code, as stated in the student handbook.) If you were at my institution, what you're proposing wouldn't violate the letter of the honor code since the work wasn't graded in another course. Your own institution probably has an honor code or a policy on "academic integrity"; it may or may not have similar language. As far as the "legality" of what you're proposing goes, your answer is probably in there somewhere.

That said, you probably still sense that your instructor might not look kindly on this—otherwise you wouldn't be here asking the question. If you were my student and you handed in work that you had written well before you even took my course, I would be somewhat disappointed. As @Kerkyra alludes to in their answer, the reason I assign essays & written work is to make you think about a subject in the context of my class, as part of the process of learning the course material. By presenting me with work whose preparation was completely separate from my course, you're depriving yourself of this opportunity to make deeper connections and understand the subject even better than you did before.

However, there could be other professors out there whose main goal in assigning a paper is simply to allow the student to demonstrate mastery of a particular subject; such a professor would probably be fine with you submitting your older work. Other professors might have different pedagogical reasons to reject the idea. So it probably boils down to the following: ask your professor whether this is acceptable. Depending on their pedagogical priorities in giving this assignment, several things might happen. They might say it's fine; they might say "I'd like you to substantially revise/rewrite it" (as suggested by @Kerkyra); they might say "actually, this paper wouldn't satisfying the requirements of this assignment, so you'll need to pick another topic"; they might say "I want everyone in the class to be writing about something they don't already know about"; or something else entirely. Ultimately, if you want to do something unusual for an assignment, it's better to ask permission of your professor than it is to risk a messy and protracted debate over its acceptability after the fact, when your grade is on the line.

  • 9
    "If you were my student and you handed in work that you had written well before you even took my course, I would be somewhat disappointed." In my opinion, it is exactly as reasonable for instructors to expect novel written work from their students as it is for students to expect novel assignments from their instructors. Very rarely did I get a university writing assignment that was generic enough that I could have even considered substituting prior work. May 22, 2017 at 16:27
  • 1
    @PeteL.Clark: By novel you mean relative to other classes, right? (As opposed to other semesters of the same class?)
    – user541686
    May 23, 2017 at 11:07
  • If someone, on their own initiative, did something before I asked them to do it, course or not, I would consider this a sign of initiative, intelligence and independence. I would be exactly the opposite of disappointed. Just because they had got inspiration before I imparted them with my morsels of wisdom does not devalue their work; who knows, maybe the freshness of their approach out of context may bring some fresh air into the rehashed routine of a lecture [Of course, always assuming it really is a suitable response to the topic set out] Sep 15, 2021 at 14:57
  • @CaptainEmacs: I suppose you're one of the professors I mentioned in my last paragraph, then. :-) I do agree that it's an admirable thing for students to do work on their own initiative. The disappointment would (for me) be more along the lines of "you had an opportunity to expand on your knowledge on this assignment but you chose to rest on your (well-earned) laurels instead." It's never the case that there's nothing more for the student to learn, and I would hope that a self-starting student like you describe would recognize that. Sep 15, 2021 at 15:48
  • @MichaelSeifert Sometimes, time is better spent against the grain and not just doing stuff because the prof wants it done (or even because the prof thinks it's the right thing to do at this stage), but because oneself wants it done. But I see your point. Sep 15, 2021 at 17:10

Some aspect that was not discussed yet is the time you invested into your essay. The other students got their topic at a specific time with a deadline so they have a limited time (maybe even while having to work on other classes in parallel) in which they can work. You however had potentially more time (or maybe nothing that distracted you) so you had an advantage by preparing this essay in advance.

At first it could be seen as unfair that you don't have to invest more time, but in the end you have been lucky and are now rewarded for your good preparation.

But this is probably such a rare case that you just have to talk to your professor.

  • Their advantage is fair: they were insightful enough to think about it before being prompted to and on their own initiative. They deserve the advantage. Sep 15, 2021 at 14:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .