When applying for a Master's, I know that extra-curriculars and part-time work barely count for anything in your application. However, say I have an average GPA but my CV shows that I was busy with several other non-academic activities during my degree, wouldn't that show that my GPA is not an indication of my full academic potential? I mean if I'm able to maintain an average GPA in a rigorous STEM course while working part-time, playing in a sports team and participating in many other things on and off campus, surely I will perform better if I just focus on my course?

  • 3
    Maybe you'd have performed better, maybe you wouldn't; you haven't given any indication either way (more time doesn't necessarily imply better grades). If your GPA is "good enough," then it doesn't matter. Otherwise, you need to justify why you should be admitted. I don't immediately see a way to do this. In the job market, your non-academic activities count for more, that is, candidates with non-academic achievements and lower GPAs are regularly picked over candidates without non-academic achievements and higher GPAs. But, I think that is less common for academic admissions. – user2768 Apr 27 '17 at 15:27
  • 1
    "If I'm able to maintain an average GPA in a rigorous STEM course while working part-time, playing in a sports team and participating in many other things on and off campus, surely I will perform better if I just focus on my course?" Yes, but what about the person who did all that and still aced their exams? Giving yourself too much to do isn't really a mitigating factor-it might even make the admissions people question how you'd handle work/life balance as a postgrad. – astronat Apr 27 '17 at 16:14
  • @astronat What makes you think that these people are more than a handful? I don't know of anyone studying maths in France that is working on the weekends and is acing the exams. – Marko Karbevski Apr 27 '17 at 16:26
  • @MarkoKarbevski you know every maths student in France?! (I'm joking of course, and you're right, perhaps these people are not as common as I suggest. It is certainly not unheard of, though. We should not be too quick to generalise either way.) – astronat Apr 27 '17 at 16:31
  • 1
    Of course some of this depends on the program, but the programs I applied to (physics) were concerned with GPA, research, GREs. Extracurricular activities were not worth much and did not necessarily justify an average GPA. If you have a few more semesters before applying, I'd suggest focusing on courses and improving your GPA. You can then discuss in your SOP how you shifted your priorities. – Hobbes Apr 27 '17 at 16:39

Your GPA is already just one metric that may be considered in an admissions process. If you're asking whether your extracurricular activity (employment included) will be considered enough to counteract a lower-than-expected GPA, then the answer is likely No, as it's much easier to compare applicants using quantifiable values than in terms of time spent on non-academic pursuits.

Perhaps the more important consideration is how the outside activities and work influenced your development as a student. Some of these can already go on your CV, especially if your work has any relation to your studies at all. Sometimes it's enough just to prove you can accomplish self-defined goals or learn quickly. Any accomplishments you can note on your CV can be helpful. Noting that you've been part of a sports team won't directly account for a low GPA but it hopefully improved you as a person - if it has occupied such a large part of your time that you believe you would have had a higher GPA otherwise, then perhaps it's worth mentioning elsewhere in an application, such as the cover letter.

The extra-curriculars don't matter on their own, but if they're relevant to who you are, they may be selling points on a grad school application. Your accomplishments as a student will still be the primary focus.

See also this previous question: Do non-academic extra curricular activities matter for grad school applications?

| improve this answer | |

What you're proposing is to write an application that says, "No, no, it's OK. I'm not an average student who got average grades: I'm an underperforming student who wasn't sufficiently committed to my course to get the grades I think I was capable of."

That isn't really an improvement over "I'm an average student who got average grades." Pretty much everybody who got average grades thinks they could have done better if only [insert some alternative history here].

The way to get somewhere that requires good grades is to get good grades. Find a master's course that will accept the grades you already have, fully commit to that course and get the grades you claim you're capable of. Then, apply for the next stage of your career (PhD, job, whatever) with the story of, "When I was an undergrad, I distracted myself with all kinds of things so I got average grades. But, look! Then I went to this decent university, fully committed to my course and got these awesome grades!"

Applications based on actual grades are strong; applications based on average grades and a promise to do better are, "Yeah, yeah, I bet s/he said that last time."

| improve this answer | |

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.