2

This question already has an answer here:

I am a postdoc with two advisors (not something I would recommend for everyone). I would describe the involvement of my two advisors in the project I undertook as quite superficial. I met and discussed a lot with them, they gave me some useful ideas, but they didn’t contribute much to the core of the project. I didn’t even feel they put genuine effort to understand what I was doing. Most of their feedback was related to ideas that didn’t work or was not implemented. If the right for authorship is defined by a significant intellectual contribution, then I wouldn’t really describe their role as such.

Is it ethical to include them as coauthors in the article summarizing this project, with an author contribution statement that describes each one’s role?

In this case their role will be something like giving useful tips, analyzing the results, ..etc.

|improve this question

marked as duplicate by David Ketcheson, scaaahu, henning, user3209815, user2390246 Apr 3 '17 at 12:47

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.

  • 2
    What does it formally mean to have two (or one for that matter) advisors as a postdoc? – Tobias Kildetoft Apr 2 '17 at 11:05
  • @TobiasKildetoft: Advisor = supervisor / boss / PI. This terminology is commonly used in math, for instance, where the relationship between postdoc and advisor is less supervisory and more collaborative. – Nate Eldredge Apr 2 '17 at 15:46
  • @Nate Right, hence the "formally". Usually when the term is used it refers to an informal relationship, which makes it unclear why the role of the person as advisor is really relevant. – Tobias Kildetoft Apr 2 '17 at 16:28
  • 1
    Is it generally accepted to negotiate authorship at the start of a project? To me that seems obvious, but I feel like I get weird reactions from my peer PhD students and faculty when I suggest this. (Perhaps I should spin this off as a separate question.) – Philip Apr 2 '17 at 17:14
  • What do your supervisors and Co authors say – StrongBad♦ Apr 2 '17 at 17:52
5

The reality is that standards for authorship are not universal across disciplines. In some disciplines, your advisors should be considered authors. In other disciplines, you advisors should not be considered authors.

|improve this answer

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.