Recently, "design science" has become a popular term in my university department, which is a department of computer science. For example, many current PhD students write in their theses that they are adopting a design science paradigm, typically referring to Herbert Simon's "The Sciences of the Artificial (1970), and Peffers et al. "A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research" (2007), among others. Why is there a need for using the term "design science" in a computer science department? Isn't computer science in itself enough? Is this a trend among other computer science departments, or is it confined to my own department only?

  • This might be a case of different cultures between fields, but do people really "adopt a paradigm" in their serious research papers? – Tobias Kildetoft Mar 22 '17 at 16:55
  • Are they truly referring to a specific paradigm, one that other researchers may not follow? If so, then the term seems entirely appropriate. If they simply mean "I'm doing computer science", and there would be no loss of information in the new sentence, then no, that seems unnecessary. – ancientcampus Mar 22 '17 at 20:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.