Journal impact factors are averages of samples of a power-law distribution (most papers are not cited, lots are highly cited). Wouldn't you expect the year-to-year impact factor to vary widely...? At least for journals publishing few papers? What is the catch?

  • 7
    The impact factors published by Thompson-Reuters are not reproducible from the citation data published by Thompson-Reuters. So who's to say how they're actually computing them? – JeffE Mar 5 '13 at 9:36
  • @JeffE: just out of pure curiosity, do you have a citation to that statement? – walkmanyi Mar 5 '13 at 20:24
  • 1
    Here you go: jcb.rupress.org/content/179/6/1091.full When we examined the data in the Thomson Scientific database, two things quickly became evident: first, there were numerous incorrect article-type designations.... Second, the numbers did not add up.... The total number of citations for each journal was substantially fewer than the number published [by] Thomson Scientific... The difference in citation numbers was as high as 19% for a given journal, and the impact factor rankings of several journals were affected when the calculation was done using the purchased data... – JeffE Mar 5 '13 at 21:44
  • 1

For completeness, I will start by stating the underlying calculation for the impact factor (source):

  1. total cites in year X
  2. Year X cites to articles published in the two year prior to year X (this is a subset of (1.))
  3. number of articles published in the two years prior to year X
  4. = (2.)/(3.) = impact factor for year X

For most journals the number of papers published per year is relatively constant (item 3.). This means that what in most cases really changes the impact factor is item (2.), how many times papers in the years prior have been cited. This number will vary according to how successful the journal is to attract good papers that can accumulate citations. Under normal circumstances the influx of papers probably follows some form of distribution in terms of "quality" (whatever that is).

If we accept this as the model (deviations are likely to exist), then a journal with a small number of papers per year will likely be more sensitive to changes in citation rate of a few papers whereas a journal with a large publication rate will likely be less sensitive.

To change the citation rate of papers in a journal is not easy. The reputation of a journal takes time to build and can be destroyed in a minute. To increase the index is therefore likely more difficult than lowering. Being editor of a small to medium international journal, I have seen that introduction of thematic issues can significantly raise the index. This comes from the fact that such issues constitute a concentration of paper on the same topic which will strongly help each other to attract referenceing; as opposed to a single paper "hidden" in melee of other unrelated papers. So there are means (strategies) to change the index, but for business as usual it will vary but not fluctuate widely. If you find journals where the index varies strongly (more than on the decimal level) it might be interesting to take a closer look and see what factors have influenced the changes.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.