33

I am a graduate student in mathematics working on functional analysis of quantum information (basically using matrix techniques in some well-known problems). I am presently applying for postdoctoral positions (in both Mathematics and Quantitative Physics departments). However, I am not getting any reply from most of the places and got a few rejection letters as well. Since I am from Mathematics, I cannot apply to experimental groups (where there are more openings). Again, being a Mathematics student and working in Physics (even though there are obvious connections between them) is not seen as a good example among certain parts of the physics community and the majority of the Mathematicians in this part of the world (personal opinion based on certain bitter experiences). I do not know whether it is the same in other places as well.

I feel that I have not projected myself by writing a good research statement. I have written it after reading the first few entries of Google search results as well as advice from the AMS. I have mostly highlighted my present work, with only a short discussion of future ideas.

To make my life more complicated, I want to move out of the present problems which I am working presently and choose some new problems for my postdoctoral research. I have a peripheral knowledge about the works of different groups. However, modifying my research statement according to the research work of each group is, I think, difficult (as I need to spend time to read their works and spot exactly where my knowledge can be used in their problems and so on). The reason for not having time is I am simultaneously working on some research problem as well as writing my thesis, which I need to submit in the coming months.

In this situation, how do I write a good research statement? I want to convey the message to potential employers that, while I have not done research on their problem yet (though I know them to certain level), given an opportunity I can learn and do work in their areas.

25

Writing a postdoctoral research statement should not be a huge exercise. Unless you are applying for a major postdoctoral fellowship, I would not necessarily expect a huge research statement. In many cases, in fact, you may not need a research statement at all to apply for a postdoctoral appointment; a cover letter, CV, and list of references may suffice. (When I hired my current postdoctoral associate, those were the materials I asked for.)

Now, that said, your statement should provide a few pieces of information:

  • A brief description of your current project, and any major research skills or tools you have acquired as a result of your training.
  • A brief summary of the kinds of problems you would like to study as a postdoctoral associate. If these are aligned with the interests of the group you are applying to, this is even more helpful.

Ultimately, however, when you are applying for a postdoctoral position, you are applying to a specific individual, who will be the one reviewing the applications. What I am looking for is someone who has actually responded to my job posting, not just a job posting. That means I want to see a clear statement that the applicant has thought about what we do in my group, and how her skills will contribute to the project for which I'm advertising. If there's no such indication, I'm much less likely to take the application seriously, unless there are mitigating factors (lots of publications in top journals, strong recommendation letters from colleagues I know, and so on).

Finally, I should also point out that the quality of your written English could be improved. While this might seem to be a minor issue, a poorly written statement can be enough for me as an advisor to think twice about hiring someone, simply because I would worry about my ability to communicate with the candidate. (Furthermore, someone whose communication skills are somewhat deficient will have a harder time finding a position than someone proficient.)

  • 8
    Written presentation is huge, especially if you do not personally know the person/team that you're submitting to. It is important to remember that a research statement, or any cover letter for that matter, is a live example of your ability to communicate effectively. – grauwulf Mar 4 '13 at 21:59
  • 6
    It's worth pointing out that math postdocs are often posted by departments not individuals, so work a bit differently than typical science postdocs. – Noah Snyder Mar 5 '13 at 3:12
  • @NoahSnyder thank you for the information. i did not know this and mail some of the faculties personally (i have applied to open positions as well though). – RSG Mar 5 '13 at 5:12
  • 9
    Writing a postdoctoral research statement should not be a huge exercise — Go on, pull the other one. In my experience, effective research statements for postdoc applications (in mathematics and computer science) are not that different from effective research statements for tenure-track faculty applications. Writing them is bloody hard. – JeffE Mar 5 '13 at 9:40
  • 2
    -1; I realize this is an old thread, but it seems to be one of the most visible answers about research statements and honestly I agree with JeffE , it seems to me to be completely misleading to make out that it is not a big deal to write a good research statement. Also in math the idea of personalizing the research statement to respond to a specific posting (particularly in the US) is definitely not what people expect. – T_M Nov 10 '18 at 14:18
18

"I have written [my research statement] after reading the first few entries of Google search results as well as advice from the AMS."

I haven't read your research statement but I would suspect that reading the first few entries off of Google may have been insufficient to fully support your consideration for a post-doc position.

Also, get someone to test read your research statement. Get some feedback on how to improve your documents and revise-revise-revise. Best of luck.

  • 11
    I can't +1 this answer enough. Get feedback from your advisor. Get feedback from faculty who hire postdocs. Get feedback from faculty whose students have landed postdocs. Get feedback from faculty in your target research area. Get feedback from successful postdocs. Then get more feedback. – JeffE Mar 5 '13 at 9:42

protected by Alexandros Dec 3 '17 at 22:17

Thank you for your interest in this question. Because it has attracted low-quality or spam answers that had to be removed, posting an answer now requires 10 reputation on this site (the association bonus does not count).

Would you like to answer one of these unanswered questions instead?

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.