1

I'm an undergrad in petroleuum engineering applying for mechanical engineering MS in graduate school

I have two options to graduate:

  1. Take 23 credits (I take 20 almost every semester anyways) and enroll in an Applied Thermodynamics course so it appears on my transcript as having taken one more mech engineering class

  2. Don't take applied thermodynamics and have all general electives and pet courses my last semester (which would still be 20 credits).

I'm trying to weigh the benefits to the costs and I'm not sure admissions officers seeing one extra mech engineering course outweighs the negatives of 23 credits... but some input would be nice!

closed as off-topic by scaaahu, user3209815, Wrzlprmft, Bob Brown, Buzz Jan 13 '17 at 14:27

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)" – scaaahu, user3209815, Wrzlprmft, Bob Brown, Buzz
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

1

IMO, it won't matter. Given that you're in the process of applying (which is a time commitment as well) I would recommend option #2.

A reassuring piece of advice a PI gave me as I began the application process was: the admissions committee and PIs you apply to work with do not look to see that you are already an expert in the area you apply to, they are looking for evidence that you have the aptitude to succeed in their graduate program.

NB: I'm in neuroscience--not engineering.

Good luck!

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.