In the course of my PhD I have written a few papers that I am planning on incorporating into my dissertation. I was first author on these papers and legitimately wrote and developed the high majority of the papers (as in, I wasn't just gifted "first author" status). In the course of our papers, my co-authors and I used some computer simulations to verify our theoretical results.

While I developed all of the theory for the paper independently, another graduate student did some of the grunt work writing the code for one of the simulations. This was done mainly just to expedite the submission of our paper, and not because I had no idea what was going on with the simulations. I actually helped develop the intricacies of the simulation; it just was not my hands on the keyboard coding it. Can I just cite our own paper in my dissertation and use its results as if they are my own, or do I need to independently replicate the results that my fellow grad student found in order to use them in my dissertation?

The underlying question here comes down to how much I can "self-cite" as my own a part of a paper that I was the main author for, but did not explicitly produce? I am aware that citing a paper I wrote is fine. I am even okay copying wording directly for certain potions of the dissertation (with a note explaining the replication). However it is unclear if I can use results that someone else found as part of my dissertation. His results give application for the theoretical framework that I am establishing for my dissertation.

  • 2
    Possible duplicate of Self-Plagiarism in PhD thesis - note, although this question might seem to be about only SELF citing, it is explicitly in the context of publications with multiple authors and the answers address this. TL;DR: there is no problem with citing your own publications in your thesis. – Bryan Krause Dec 13 '16 at 0:01

If those results are published, cite the publication. If those results are unpublished, you can cite the contribution of the other student either where you present the results ("Otherguy and Vladhagen, unpublished, 2015") or in an acknowledgment (I would favor the latter). Your advisor should be able to answer questions like this as you write your dissertation as well.

Note that in academic work, "writing code" is not held to the same level as intellectual input: it's good that you want you make sure your colleague gets appropriate credit, but it just isn't the same as developing ideas. The same would go for other "grunt work" in a lab: culturing the cells, washing the dishes, running the PCR. That type of credit goes in the "acknowledgments" section, or with some added intellectual work and help drafting the manuscript, they get a middle authorship. Science is a collaborative process, and no one expects your work in your dissertation to be yours and yours alone without anyone's help.

If you want to distribute the code itself, you would want to have permission of the person writing the code.

| improve this answer | |
  • 1
    @rjzii: I'd say it depends on the level of programming. Writing scripts to automate simulations? Definitely on the level of culturing cells, washing dishes, etc. Writing a new kernel/filesystem/framework? Definitely not on the level of culturing cells, washing dishes, etc. – tonysdg Dec 13 '16 at 3:15
  • @rjzii: Fair point! – tonysdg Dec 13 '16 at 3:21
  • 2
    @rjzii I feel like the OP suggested the implementation of this simulation was fairly straightforward and specifically referred to "grunt work," and the OP had input in designing the program. To me, that's sort of "hired programmer" work, vs. scientific work. If the programmer was developing algorithms, etc, that is clearly intellectual work; doesn't change whether OP can use it in the dissertation with due credit, though. Also I'd say that although cell culture isn't in my line of work, for certain cells I know it takes a lot of experience and technique - still an acknowledgment. :) – Bryan Krause Dec 13 '16 at 3:30

If you can write a research thesis, with a narrative taking you from start to end, which you know to be your own narrative - a progression of ideas, findings and conclusions which reflects your own progression over the course of your PhD - then the fact the a part of the work was done jointly with others should not be a problem (neither ethically and getting-the-title-wise).

But of course - always cite and give credit where relevant.

| improve this answer | |

You can add and appreciate his work in acknowledgment section. Moreover if you have published an article based on his simulation and he is a co-author you can also cite that article in your thesis.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.