35

I know there is nothing preventing me from publishing an article in a different research field, but is it beneficial other than for satisfying my own interest/curiosity? Presumably these may be added to my CV, and possibly included for funding applications?

  • 1
  • You've asked about publishing a paper in a different field, and others have answered that question. However, you should also think about the effort to publish in another field: will you take too much time to gain background compared to the output? – Blaisorblade Apr 30 '15 at 19:48
  • 6
    I stopped reading after "Is it beneficial to publish papers", since anything after that is irrelevant and the answer will be yes. – Marc Claesen May 1 '15 at 8:02
35

I'm honestly surprised at the question. "Primary" does not mean "only"!

If it's a good paper, then of course you should publish it. Aside from the obvious personal benefits of making you look more diverse, increasing your visibility in another field, and possibly creating opportunities for future collaboration, you're doing what research is for: expanding human knowledge. And if it's not a good paper, then of course you shouldn't publish it, even if it is in your primary field.

But to echo shan23's comment: Don't use grants in area X to fund research in area Y.

  • Thanks for the reply. This is good to know, and I think I will pursue my publication idea. – user479 Mar 19 '12 at 13:31
14

I'd say it depends, on how tangential the research field is from your primary focus, and how you came to work on that field. Researchers working on interdisciplinary fields often have this kind of a scenario (which I would label as an advantageous one) - it would help you in case you ever wanted to change your research focus, as the grant agencies could see from your publication track record that you have done publishable research on more than one research field.

But, it might not be a very good idea to use funds/grants from your primary research focus for working on a different field. You should be able to show that these publications were in addition to the work that you published in your principal research area.

  • Thank you as well for your input. I agree also about not funding X with funds from Y, and that they should be independent efforts. – user479 Mar 19 '12 at 13:31
-1

This is an interesting question. I recently was interviewed for a job and one of the interviewers asked me about a couple of papers which were clearly outside of my field of specialization. She wanted to know 'what these papers say about me and my professional capacity'. I was not prepared... and I said something along the lines of that ... I observe everything and try to identify problems and give solutions, even in a field that I am not directly studying... which, by the way, is my true reason to venture outside of my field. Now, looking at some of the responses maybe I was not wrong to go out of my field and produce some publications.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy