I couldn't find papers that cite patents. Is it OK to cite patents? If yes, what are the reasons for scarce patent citations?


1 Answer 1


There are certainly papers citing patents, mostly in engineering fields. So, yes it is certainly OK to cite a patent.

Now patents have an entirely different purpose than scientific articles. They usually contain detailed descriptions of methods and devices and (sometimes wild) speculations about practical applications of these. Useful to protect potential commercial use, but not really to scientists wanting to build on existing knowledge.

More specifically, what they typically don't contain are original experimental data, or other means of scientifically evaluating the described methods or devices.

Very often, if the development of the patented method or device has led to scientific discoveries, these have been published separately as articles (or conference proceedings for the fields where that applies). Those will be much more scientifically informative, and hence more likely to be cited in academic articles.

  • "or other means of scientifically evaluating the described methods or devices" - the scientifically can probably be dropped. It is just not the purpose of a patent to prove that the presented technology works. Nov 8, 2016 at 19:04
  • @Cape Code Thanks for the answer. Now I use "Google Patent" search to find out patents. Any other source to refer patents. I am interested in chemical physics, condensed matter physics, materials science related patents.
    – phenomenon
    Nov 11, 2016 at 16:30
  • @phenomenon Google scholar is a pretty comprehensive database. But your institution's library certainly can help with searching patents.
    – Cape Code
    Nov 11, 2016 at 19:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .