19

My university requires Computer Information Systems majors to complete the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) through SkillsOne (CPP online assessment system) as a part of an ongoing research study, in the university's terms "to help advise incoming freshman". Completing this assessment is mandatory for all graduating seniors - i.e. you cannot graduate unless your name appears in the list the department receives from the testing site at the end of the semester.

The paradoxical thing is that the institution requires informed consent from participants, as required by the Institutional Review Board (IRB), yet participation is a requirement, which goes against the idea of voluntary participation. IRB quote from the informed consent page (emphasis mine):

Potential participants must be provided with information about the research project that is understandable and that permits them to make an informed and voluntary decision about whether or not to participate.

So, forced participation in this research study violates IRB requirements, yet it is required in order to graduate. Is this ethical on the part of my institution?

Aside: Personally I have no problem with such an assessment, but I have no choice but to agree to participate which bothers me slightly, given that my identity (first name, last name, institutional email) is tied to my responses. I am inclined to think that others feel the same way. However, this question is not about my personal opinion, but on the ethicality of such a graduation requirement.

  • 1
    Another similar thing is that many (most?) psych departments in the US require that their undergrads participate in a certain number of experiments. I'm curious about this as well. – Austin Henley Nov 3 '16 at 3:44
  • 1
    Re: IRB informed consent rules, it's possible that this effort is classified as a quality improvement project within a specific institution, rather than research that is "designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge". (Obviously I don't have enough information to say for sure that it is or isn't.) QI projects aren't legally required to follow the same guidelines. (Of course, even if it's legal, that doesn't necessarily mean it is ethical.) – ff524 Nov 3 '16 at 3:44
  • 1
    @ff524 I think you may be right on that, given the wording "to help advise incoming freshman". But we could make this a generalizable question, right? As Austin said, many institutions require participation like this in the courses. I understand the practicality of it for psychology, but for computer science it's a different story. – Chris Cirefice Nov 3 '16 at 3:46
  • 1
    Related (off-site): on asking students to provide private information about themselves as part of a graduation requirement. See this, this, and this. – ff524 Nov 3 '16 at 4:19
  • 1
    @ff524 All 3 articles are about the same university and its survey on sexual assault as part of Title IX compliance. Those are pretty personal questions, so I would feel that it's far more unethical than the MBTI I am required to fill out, as the MBTI is basically 50% the same question : "are you a rational, reserved type or not?". But in the general sense, students are forced to participate in a survey that could 1. Personally identify them, and 2. Potentially make them uncomfortable. – Chris Cirefice Nov 3 '16 at 4:25
19
+50

If this is a school located in the United States, then no it would not be ethical or legal for this to be a requirement in your program. You quoted from the federal rules quite accurately. Your school is breaking two rules regarding compulsion and anonymity.

Informed Consent

The HHS regulations state that “An investigator shall seek such consent only under circumstances that provide the prospective subject or the representative sufficient opportunity to consider whether or not to participate and that minimize the possibility of coercion or undue influence” (45 CFR 46.116).

Subjects cannot be compelled or feel undue influence to take a psychological test as part of their educational program:

  • Unless it served a clear educational reason such as a placement exam (such a placement exam would not be considered to fall within the purview of human subjects testing).
  • Or, an alternative given. For example, at most universities, first year psychology students are often required to be in the "testing pool" -- however, they need to be given opt out options such as doing library research or other tasks in lieu of the examination. Furthermore, as with all test participants, they can show up for a test and leave at any time without penalty - including before the test begins.

Further reading: https://www.msudenver.edu/irb/guidance/informedconsent/coercionandinfluence/

Privacy and Confidentiality

"(7) When appropriate, there are adequate provisions to protect the privacy of subjects and to maintain the confidentiality of data." (45 CFR 46.111)

Furthermore, human subjects must be assured of the privacy and confidentiality of their data. Everyone has the right to have their psych eval score remain private and confidential. This may be a violation of not just the federal rules for IRB but HIPAA as well, since whether you took a medical test or not is in itself protected medical information.

What to do

If I were at your school, I would make a complaint (either individually or banding together with other students) to the IRB, to the ombudsperson, or to risk management / compliance. You could also complain to your state or federal Office of Civil Rights, Department of Education, or Health and Human Services.

And finally, because you are being to compelled against your will to take the exam and the results are not anonymous, I do not think you have any duty to answer the questions truthfully if you feel that doing so will negatively impact your career.

The issue of compulsion and corresponding bad data is one reason why psychology is currently having problems with study replication as well as being able to broaden its findings beyond their limited sample populations.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.