I got a request to review a paper from a journal. I know the topic area well, but I've had some recent collaborations with some of the authors. Should I decline the request because of this? What is the common practice here?


It's potentially a conflict of interest, but some fields are small and have few competent reviewers. Tell the editors, and let them decide. They can offset a bias in their final decision in an informed way, or take you off the review if they believe this poses a problem.

  • There are separate links to accept or reject the request, so I'm not sure if this is a possibility.
    – user11550
    Sep 29 '16 at 13:59
  • @user11550 Presumably you know the name of the editor though, so can make direct contact with them?
    – Ian_Fin
    Sep 29 '16 at 14:03
  • Isn't there an email through which it was sent? A "reply" usually works. Sep 29 '16 at 14:04
  • 1
    Given that any time that the editor spends waiting to find out that they can't use the review is time they've not used for finding a new reviewer, it would always be best to clarify this with the editor as soon as possible. Hopefully this should be obvious, but I wouldn't want any reader misunderstanding @StephanKolassa's comment as a suggestion to write the review and then notify the editor of the potential conflict of interest.
    – Ian_Fin
    Sep 29 '16 at 14:25
  • 1
    From personal experience, I would suggest directly e-mailing the editor who was named in the request to review, or the editor-in-chief if there wasn't one. The "reply" may go to an editorial assistant who doesn't know what to do with your question. (If you can't get a reply from them about this question, I might suggest these are not editors you want to review for (or submit papers to!)) Sep 29 '16 at 22:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.