Recently, in my research lab we were able to achieve a performance of X % for some problem. This X is far better than the performance Y which was achieved by some other research group for the exact problem, very recently (two months ago).

Yes, we can always compare X and Y and publish the paper alone. But, I was thinking that it is better to collaborate with that research group and share with them the results of our approach.

  • Should my research group collaborate with them?

  • Is this a proper way of collaboration?

  • Should they feel that our group is weaker than they are and that this is why we are trying to collaborate (a feeling of insecurity)?

Could I get some suggestions on this?

  • 7
    Why are you looking to collaborate with them? It's not clear from your question what is motivating this idea, and I feel that this knowledge may be needed to produce the best possible answer. – Ian_Fin Sep 29 '16 at 8:22
  • 1
    Don't collaborate just for the sake of collaboration. You need to figure out how you see the collaboration yielding results that could not be achieved if the two labs continued on their individual paths. I'm assuming you are the head of your lab. Figure out your goals and how a collaboration with the other group would help you achieve them. Then, meet with the head of the other lab and share your thoughts. – mikeazo Sep 29 '16 at 12:44

First, it not just to say "Let's us collaborate with them!" That's not how collaborations start in the first place. To get a collaboration started you need several prerequisites: Genuine interest in the same problems (seems to be given here), similar knowledge and similar goals but also complementing expertise, being open for new ideas from the other side, and most important: Genuine interest in a collaboration in the first place.

Based on the above, I would never approach somebody (or some group) with the question "can we collaborate on this" but always start differently. The start may be different in different cases, it can, e.g., be just informal discussion with an individual without any particular goals besides getting to know each other, it could be a meeting of the workgroups with the purpose of exchanging ideas or it could be an invitation of somebody to give a talk. To see if this may lead to a collaboration is the second step…

Should my research group collaborate with them?

I can't answer it, and probably nobody here can. If you think that a collaboration can be beneficial, than go ahead and contact them.

Is this a proper way of collaboration?

I don't see an answer here either, since I do not see any collaboration yet. I can say that working on the same problems may be a basis for a collaboration. What would also be helpful, would be if your groups attack the same problem with different methods so that combining expertise may be helpful.

Should they feel that our group is weaker than they are and that this is why we are trying to collaborate (a feeling of insecurity)?

I don't think that anybody will jump to this conclusion just because you asked for collaboration. I would also not jump to this conclusion based just on results for one single project (but you told that your results are even better than their results…).

| improve this answer | |

A collaboration is useful if:

  1. you work on a very related or the same problem and
  2. you can offer them expertise or tools that they otherwise wouldn't have and they can offer you expertise or tools that you otherwise wouldn't have.

If you can answer yes to both questions, then you should evaluate whether you can build up trust if you do not know them yet.

| improve this answer | |
  • +1. We can offer them computational techniques and they can probably contribute in the physical phenomena of the problem. – Coder Sep 29 '16 at 18:00

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.