Is it a good practice to include an abbreviation in a title of a research paper. for example : PC , IDE , RAM

  • 2
    Look around. How many authors do that? – scaaahu Jan 21 '13 at 4:05
  • 5
    if it's well known abbreviations I believe it's OK. – seteropere Jan 21 '13 at 4:38
  • 1
    Why would you want to? – StrongBad Jan 21 '13 at 9:00
  • 1
    Most of your examples are actually acronyms, not abbreviations. In my experience acronyms are pretty common in titles. There are plenty of acronyms where writing it out is rather unusual. AES, TCP, FPGA... – CodesInChaos Jan 21 '13 at 11:37
  • I am seriously against using abbreviations/acronyms. Please take a look at this wiki page and tell me if I write a communication related paper of title ... ATM..., what is the ATM I am referring to? – scaaahu Jan 22 '13 at 4:59

It is acceptable if (Edit: and only if) the abbreviation you are using is common (in your field or in general) and there is no risk of confusion.

I have two papers whose titles contain the abbreviation (RD) which stands for (Rapid Decay). Since it is an acceptable abbreviation in our field these titles are fine.

The best way to find out is to check similar papers or titles in your field.

| improve this answer | |
  • 3
    That first "if" should be "if and only if". If a abbreviation can cause confusion, don't use it in the title, even if it's common. (If all your friends jumped off a cliff....) – JeffE Jan 21 '13 at 20:23
  • 4
    On the other hand, you should prefer abbreviations if the alternative would cause confusion. For example: if you're writing a computer science paper, don't expand the abbreviations P and NP! – JeffE Jan 21 '13 at 20:25
  • that would be quite hilarious. – Suresh Jan 22 '13 at 4:24

There is a big difference between can and good practice. I can think of no reason why it should be considered good practice and a number of reasons why it would be bad practice. despite this, many journals will allow you to use abbreviations in titles, but you will need to check with the editor to see if you can.

| improve this answer | |
  • Why would it be bad practice? – Tommi Sep 18 '15 at 11:02

I would go against the checking similar papers in the field, and more with checking the submission guidelines.

For example the IEEE Trans in Evolutionary Computation will reject any paper with Acronyms in the title.

Yeah, it just happened to us recently, that is the reason I know, however it was our first time submitting to that Journal, and we had no trouble with acronyms before.

A friend even told us that the very same journal asked him to put the explanation of S.O.S. since it was an acronym as well.

So, I would recommend checking the submission guidelines.

| improve this answer | |
  • 7
    Ironic that a journal with an acronym in the journal title will reject any paper with acronyms in the title. – gerrit Jan 21 '13 at 12:33
  • If community practice conflicts with the journal's submission guidelines, the journal's submission guidelines are broken. Submit elsewhere. – JeffE Jan 21 '13 at 20:18

Using acronyms/abbreviations in title is very bad practice. Doing it also in abstract and highlights, which are all separate documents used by indexing services, is also bad. Avoid it.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.