In (pure?) mathematics, the order of the authors for a given paper is almost exclusively always alphabetical. This leads me to believe that there may be a similar convention when writing acknowledgements.

In what order should acknowledgments be written in a math paper? By order of importance (increasing or decreasing), by alphabetical order, or something else? Does it not matter?


It generally doesn't matter much (though I wouldn't suggest using in increasing order of helpfulness), but if some people deserve special thanks they should be singled out. I'll often write acknowledgements in this sort of format:

  1. I thank Prof A for encouraging me to think about this problem and Prof B for the realization that it could be approached by X ("chronological order").
  2. I also thank C, D and E (alphabetical order) for useful discussions and feedback.
  3. This work was partially supported by Grant 12345.

If it's a co-authored paper you can separate sentences/phrases for specific thanks from each author.

Generally my advice on questions like this is just to look at a bunch of other papers, see what they do, and learn from that.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy