In a Geopyhsics paper going into a more general interest journal (say PNAS as a good example), with the headings,

  • Introduction
  • Materials and Methods
  • Results
  • Discussion

I plan to have 3-4 paragraphs in which I compare my results with other results in the literature.

Should this section go in the results or discussion section of my paper? The comparisons are what will be of most interest to the majority of readers of the paper and my results are most relevant when viewed in the context of earlier results.


The results section is for your results. The discussion section is for discussing them - and this includes the significance in light of other results.

Keep the former purely for statements, the facts of the matter. The latter is where you move into interpretation (and expanding on very brief comments which are necessary for reading results reported).

| improve this answer | |
  • Do any exceptions exist to this rule? – If you do not know- just GIS Jul 18 '16 at 3:30
  • I assume that if you are reporting results, they are your own, or at least those of your coauthors. Mixing the work of your collaboration and that of others with no relation becomes highly complicated at best, confusing or hard to read most often, and quite possibly misleading. Better to make clear what is the fruit of your own work, and then make clear what is a comparison of that to others'. – Nij Jul 18 '16 at 4:02
  • I have no intention of misleading anyone. – If you do not know- just GIS Jul 18 '16 at 14:08
  • While I think that is true, what we intend to do is not always what happens. – Nij Jul 18 '16 at 20:46

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.