0

My advisor is changing institutions, and I am at the end of my 4th year in a computational biology program and have passed through all my formal requirements. I have no publications due to the nature of my project.

What would it mean to change advisors at this point. I have been supported by my fellowship ever since I joined this lab (three years), but my funding will be over starting this upcoming academic year. Either my current advisor or advisor I switch to will have to support me with their funding.

closed as off-topic by Cape Code, scaaahu, user3209815, Wrzlprmft, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩 Jul 15 '16 at 12:57

This question appears to be off-topic. The users who voted to close gave this specific reason:

  • "The answer to this question strongly depends on individual factors such as a certain person’s preferences, a given institution’s regulations, the exact contents of your work or your personal values. Thus only someone familiar can answer this question and it cannot be generalised to apply to others. (See this discussion for more info.)" – scaaahu, Wrzlprmft, Brian Tompsett - 汤莱恩
If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

  • 2
    How are we supposed to answer this question? Obviously we can't make a decision for you, and we know less about your particular situation than you do - so what do you want us to tell you that you don't already know? – ff524 Jul 15 '16 at 1:22
  • A more specific/suitable question would be: What a change of advisors would mean at this point of the phd? Is this related to what you want to know? – Fábio Dias Jul 15 '16 at 2:01
  • Is it worth it? is really up to you. Please clarify why you used your own fund up to now? Who is supporting you? Are you looking for funding at this time? – scaaahu Jul 15 '16 at 5:40
  • please see changes above – guest948576 Jul 15 '16 at 20:56
4

One important piece of information you give here is that you do not have any publications. I can't comment precisely about the field of computational biology, but in many fields (e.g. engineering, CS...) this will adversely affect your prospects for an academic position after you finish your PhD. I would say that you should make publishing a priority, and decide accordingly.

If you are close to getting results from your current project with your advisor, you could consider continuing. If the project is a true dead-end, you could consider making changes; but another option could be to finish as soon as possible and try to somehow find a post-doc position in a setting where you can be more productive.

  • Without publications it is rather difficult to find a post-doc without the word of your supervisor/professors. – Mikey Mike Jul 17 '16 at 20:11
  • @MikeyMike - true; hence, "somehow." – mbaytas Jul 18 '16 at 4:35

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.