8

A couple of days ago, it was announced that SSRN—a popular working paper archive in the social sciences—was purchased by Elsevier. As Elsevier is one of the most reviled of publishers, many scholars are now looking elsewhere for places to store working papers, and arXiv is an obvious candidate, but arXiv focuses nearly exclusively on technology and the natural sciences.

Is there an established procedure to petition arXiv to expand its coverage to include other disciplines, or do we just have to hope they notice and make the change?

4
  • 3
    I suspect a cash sustained infusion will be part of the winning argument. No idea how much would need to be involved, however. Commented May 21, 2016 at 3:35
  • To expand upon what @dmckee says - extending arXiv to essentially a completely new discipline will take non-trivial amounts of cash, not least because to do so with any seriousness will also require reprogramming of the platform (you know, standards vary between disciplines).
    – xLeitix
    Commented May 22, 2016 at 16:40
  • This is some new information. Other disciplines don't ise pdfs for papers. Commented May 22, 2016 at 17:56
  • Figshare . The same principle; no limitations on subjects. I like it Commented May 24, 2016 at 18:27

1 Answer 1

1

Only arXiv offers the guarantees against new takeovers.
All the cloud services around might suddenly change their open policies at best.

arXiv platform is well engineered and there is already a Quantitative Finance category, adding more in the economics side should not be a problem, if they are willing to.

One possibility is to start a campaign on specialised webservices such as change.org.

With a lot of people asking, they might easily take into consideration the proposals to widen their scope.

The major problem would be how to advertise this campaign. Your question got an average 80 views in 10 days.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .