I have a friend who works at a small university with limited resources. Since he has a gift for methodology and statistics he frequently supports colleagues with their studies. He helps with the methodology and data analysis often. It is not uncommon for him to support people in Education (his field), English, TESOL, and Business since to do simple studies in these fields involves descriptive stats, regression, ANOVA, etc. In other words, basic research methods

In exchange for his support, he gets to be second author on these papers.

His concern is all this wide variety in research on his CV. His own research is focused when he's the lead but whatever his friends want to study is up to them. There aren't too many others available to help out with the technical aspects where he works at. Therefore, If he ever applies for a job somewhere else, what would a committee think of such a chaotic CV?

  • 2
    I've never been on a hiring committee, but I would think that, as long as his publication record in his own field is competitive, having more publications in other fields won't hurt. Especially if he has separate sections in his CV for education papers and miscellaneous papers. And he can probably sell himself as "interdisciplinary," which may help him with some committees.
    – user37208
    Commented Apr 30, 2016 at 17:36
  • 5
    My understanding is that this sort of cross-disciplinary consultation, leading to second authorship, is particularly common for statisticians, so I don't think hiring committees would be at all surprised. As Wolfgang's answer says, though, this isn't a substitute for doing his own research. Commented Apr 30, 2016 at 19:11
  • 2
    I'm in exactly this situation, and I have separate sections in my CV on my "core" specialty (forecasting) and my "service" activities (inferential statistics for psychologists). One point is that coauthorships as a statistician come with rather little effort, and I'll have five such "service" coauthorships for every "core" paper I coauthor, so the CV sections are pretty unbalanced in length. Then again, I can't say what a hiring committee would say to this, being in industry. Commented Apr 30, 2016 at 20:45

1 Answer 1


I can't think of a case where research or publications outside one's core area would have hurt an applicant, and would think that most departments actually think positively about it. What's important, though, is that the research and publication record within one's core area remains strong and prolific. If you only publish a paper every other year in your own area, but 2 every year with people outside your area, then a department might legitimately question how much you actually bring to their table.


You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .