How can someone become a multi-disciplinary researcher?

For example, can one study a multi-disciplinary domain that combines signal processing, artificial intelligence (neural net, machine learning), robotics, instrumentation and control engineering, and embedded systems? Is there a path that could make a candidate a marketable researcher across all these domains?

  • Building an android might use all those things. I guess strictly speaking the android's mind could be in the cloud instead of embedded. Apr 10, 2016 at 2:11
  • I think by their very nature "fields" don't combine things. Projects/applications do.
    – Nick T
    Apr 10, 2016 at 2:16
  • 1
    @NickT there are university departments that are intrinsically inter-disciplinary - for example energy studies combines physics, engineering, law, behavioural psychology, economics, and a few other disciplines. At least some consider energy studies to be a field - enough people to set up university departments in it, for example.
    – 410 gone
    Apr 10, 2016 at 3:08
  • 4
    By doing multi-disciplinary research.
    – JeffE
    Apr 11, 2016 at 1:27
  • 1

3 Answers 3


To answer the general question: You can be a interdisciplinary researcher by getting multiple degrees in different fields, getting a single interdisciplinary degree, or by getting a degree in one field and, over the course of your career, working your way into another.

Most academic jobs are hired by departments, and the wide majority of departments are single-disiplinary, though interdisciplinary programs are fashionable right now.

To be a marketable researcher in a given discipline, you would generally need at least a phd in that discipline, possibly a interdisciplinary phd that centrally involved it (marketability depends a lot on the specific interdisciplinary program, but in general, these will be less appealing than an phd in the actual discipline), or, in very rare cases, a a phd in a different discipline but VERY extensive research in that discipline. When it comes to the latter, things are probably more flexible in the humanities than in the sciences, and often only in one direction (ex. there are philosophy phds in rhetoric departments, but not rhetoric phds in philosophy departments). In general, you need to be able to teach introductory courses in that discipline as well as in your particular area.

Some universities do have particular interdisciplinary departments or other interdisciplinary lines, but these are in established interdisciplinary subjects—cognitive science, peace studies, asian cultures, environmental studies...

There are also "cluster hires," where universities look to give a researcher appointments in multiple departments for work on topics like diaspora studies and agroecology that are appealing to administrators but too small to support entire departments. Cluster hires are rare and are not something you can plan a career around.

There are no lines for unspecified "interdisciplinary" researchers. You need to be able to market yourself under a specific discipline or under an established interdisciplinary program. In general, the latter will be harder.


There are two groups of researchers relevant to your question. The inter-disciplinary ones, and the multi-disciplinary ones.

I know one or two hundred inter-disciplinary researchers. With a couple of exceptions (so now we're down to a tiny tiny proportion of all researchers), they nevertheless all have a single specialism: in each case, it's a specialism that spans more than one traditional topic. Typically, they did one (or occasionally two) Masters' degree(s) in fields different to their first degree, and then did an inter-disciplinary PhD.

Only the exceptions are multi-disciplinary. We became that through many years of working across different fields. We're not specialists in all of those fields. But we know enough to be able to work in teams that consist of specialists from any combination of them. None of us planned it this way - it just emerged as a consequence of our (lack of) career path.

Many fields see the multi-disciplinary researcher as something of a luxury. In the first instance, most principal investigators and other research leaders seem to prefer single-discipline experts. An enlightened few see the benefits of creating the best team, rather than just selecting the best individuals; and for inter-disciplinary work, a multi-disciplinary researcher can be the catalyst that enhances the performance of the rest of the team, as well as doing research in their own right.

  • I would disagree with the idea that becoming multi-disciplinary is from a lack of career path, at least it does not have to be that way. A person can end up with a half a dozen degrees in different areas, and yet still have a central theme or area of knowledge about which their education is organized. (As opposed to the people you label as "interdisciplinary". My view is opposite yours: all the people I know fit your definition of multidisciplinary, having degrees in odd combinations of fields and ending up doing work at the edge of a traditional discipline. May 5, 2016 at 16:19

This is a tough question. I will set aside the issues of whether it is "interdisciplinary," "multidisciplinary," "cross-disciplinary" or any of a number of other terms that some people get very emotional about. I have heard some people give definitions of all of these terms that overlap, and my humanities friends definitely have strong opinions about them, while my science friends often just can't see the point of using any of the terms or keep them straight.

This sort of work is intrinsically hard to support in academic settings. Many departments actively punish people who do inter-, cross-, multi-disciplinary work in promotion decisions, by either downgrading the importance of that work in the promotion decision or completely removing it from the calculation; effectively saying "focus on what we do, here." Most interdisciplinary workers I know believe that they are behind the curve on promotions and advancement.

So programs that are truly interdisciplinary are rare. (There are some great exceptions, "Energy Studies" was mentioned in comments, and "Neuroethics" exists at my school -- there are others. Basically once a set of topics get pushed together often enough they can form their own field or discipline.)

You seem to be interested in the student or taking-classes side of this, so I will focus on that.

First, look at the topics you are trying to combine and see if they exist in that combination. For instance, you mentioned neural nets and machine learning which 20+ years ago were semi-independent fields (the former often in computer science departments and the latter often in engineering), and are now the inter-disciplinary "artificial intelligence" (at least at some schools; your local history may vary). Likewise, instrumentation and control engineering, embedded systems, and robotics will all include strong signal processing components. So signal processing may be covered in the others.

So start by picking as a central field one that combines the maximum number of interests you have.

Then, pick your second majors and minors carefully to fill in more, if you can. You may end up getting multiple degrees along the way, all in different fields. That is what happened to me, I have a BA/BS, three masters degrees, and a PhD; all in different fields, and all important to the work I do these days.

Just as importantly as degrees and classes are projects. Often part of education is doing projects and you usually get to pick topics that interest you. Pick things that combine topics you want to combine. To do projects you will need a lot of self-study, a skill you will need a lot of if you are serious about being multi/inter/cross-disciplinary in your working life.

But a lot of inter/cross/multi-disciplinary work only comes into existence once you get to work. So expect to keep learning well past the degree phase. That may be where you get the most of the stuff that makes your work interdisciplinary.

  • Please define more clearly what you mean by actively punish.
    – virmaior
    May 3, 2016 at 7:32
  • Well there are departments I have been exposed to that will simply say to a researcher "this is a business school department [for instance], so all of that publishing you did in statistics and computing we don't really consider in your tenure decision." That actually happened to a colleague. He was told that he needed to be working on papers in his discipline or he would not make tenure and need to get a new job. That is as active as punishment can get for doing interdisciplinary work; loss of livelihood! May 5, 2016 at 16:11

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .