This question already has an answer here:

I've been using Google Scholar search engine for a while in order to find scientific articles for my master thesis, but I've come to notice that the search algorithm is not as good as the real google search engine.

I feel that Scholar requires quite specific search terms in order to find the right articles. Does anybody share my experience and is it true that the Google Scholar search engine is worse at searching than the main Google Engine?

marked as duplicate by EnergyNumbers, user3209815, gman, vonbrand, jakebeal publications Mar 22 '16 at 18:09

This question has been asked before and already has an answer. If those answers do not fully address your question, please ask a new question.


It's not so much "worse" as it is "different". The base Google Scholar search uses a number of defaults that may not be optimal for a given search. Check out Publish or Perish which uses the Google Scholar API and provides a number of additional means of searching such as citation counts, journal sorting, etc. that can be a lot more useful. It also has an alternate option to use the Microsoft Academic Search API, which provides an alternative set of results.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.