5

I am the second author of three, and the only one who does not have an active membership. I have little need for the other services provided by IEEE, as I already have access to XPLORE through my work.

  • 2
    Are you certain that you aren't a member? If you've gone to an IEEE conference within the last year, you're probably a member because they tend to make membership+registration cheaper than non-member registration. – jakebeal Mar 2 '16 at 19:22
  • 3
    @jakebeal, maybe, maybe not. My university refuses to pay professional society membership dues even if it saves on total conference attendance costs which they are paying. This may be a funding agency rule at some agencies in the US, or it may be local to my university. I do not know. – Bill Barth Mar 2 '16 at 19:34
  • 1
    @BillBarth Interesting: for most people I know it is standard to put it as part of their conference costs, which I suspect is why IEEE does it that way. – jakebeal Mar 2 '16 at 20:04
  • 1
    @jakebeal, my research indicates that NSF is vague on allowing this and NIH explicitly allows it. It may be a local rule. – Bill Barth Mar 2 '16 at 20:07
11

Nope, and I doubt anyone would notice or care.

Everyone can be a member, all it takes is a bit of money.

  • I've never understood why people say "Member, IEEE" after their name on some papers. All it means is that they paid the fee. – Thomas Mar 3 '16 at 2:54
  • 1
    @ThomasS It wouldn't surprise me if it was started/encouraged by IEEE. – Austin Henley Mar 3 '16 at 2:56
  • 1
    @ThomasS you usually see it in Journal publications and it is the standard of presenting authors "Name, IEEE rank". Also the 'Student, Graduate and Member" ranks are a simple subscription but certainly 'Senior Members' and especially 'Fellow' ranks show recognition and contribution to the profession and the EE society. – o4tlulz Mar 3 '16 at 12:21
-2

As mentioned, I doubt anyone cares, except if you or co-authors are Fellows, then it'll carry some weight. It might convey the following message: the paper has been vetted and informally approved by esteemed member(s) of the IEEE and therefore all reviewers+editor should accept the paper with a grain of salt.

  • "a grain of salt" means read cautiously and without trusting the authors completely, which is the opposite of the rest of your answer. – Azor Ahai Mar 13 '16 at 5:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.