Several papers that I have read only indent paragraphs that are not the first paragraph of a section:

1.1 Introduction

This is the first paragraph.

    This is the second paragraph.

    This is the third paragraph.

Is this a common convention? Are there rules for when to indent like this?

  • 5
    Yes, it's a fairly common typographical convention. It generally looks nicer, but someone with a better knowledge of typography (there should be at least one copy editor around here) can probably give you a sounder reason for that. Jan 29, 2016 at 22:30
  • 5
    I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about typsetting and has nothing to do with academia. Jan 30, 2016 at 7:56

1 Answer 1


Copied from this answer on writers.SE:

[...] in Robert Bringhurst's Elements of Typographic Style, he states that "opening paragraphs" should be "flush left" because "[t]he function of a paragraph indent is to mark a pause, setting the paragraph apart from what precedes it. If a paragraph is preceded by a title or subhead, the indent is superfluous and can therefore be omitted".

  • 1
    "to mark a pause, setting the paragraph apart from what precedes it" - a more tangible reason is to tell apart a mid-paragraph pagebreak from one that coincides with a new paragraph, while looking at the second page. Jan 30, 2016 at 11:32

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .