I was somewhat surprised when reviewing the Full Paper Template from the Journal of Computational Chemistry, which states that the abstract text should contain "no personal pronouns". I have seen many articles which go against this and even several that have been published in this journal recently (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.24217/full, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.24225/full, http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.24252/full).

In this specific case, I plan to follow whatever instructions the editor provides. In general though, is it better to avoid using personal pronouns in the abstract for scientific writing?


The requirement you have found refers to the text of the graphical abstract, not to the textual abstract. A graphical abstract is an image with little text: thus, it is reasonable to have stricter requirements, with respect to standard abstracts, on what is allowed or not.

See also this page on graphical abstracts.

As for standard abstracts, I quickly checked a few author guides from IEEE, IOP and AIP and none of them seem against the usage of personal pronouns in abstracts. Also The Chicago Manual of Style, 16ed, does not mention anything about the usage of pronouns in abstracts. I've used the pronoun "we" in several abstracts and no one objected.

In general, the main requirement is that the abstract should be self-contained: no citations (if really necessary they should be written inline), or references to figures and tables.

| improve this answer | |
  • This may be the case. The way they have the page formatted, it looks like what they label as Abstract is instead the Graphical Abstract. There is another headings stating that the Graphical Abstract is later (far from the note about not using personal pronouns). This would make more sense as none of the Graphical Abstracts in the examples I posted use personal pronouns. So to answer my question, you are saying, "No, in general, using personal pronouns in the abstract is fine," correct? – Steven C. Howell Jan 15 '16 at 21:47
  • @stvn66: To me, it seems that they allow both kind of abstracts: the one labelled Abstract on the first page is the textual abstract, then you can add a graphical abstract, as described at the end. But, the template is really not very clear. For the last point, see my edit to the answer. – Massimo Ortolano Jan 15 '16 at 21:56

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.