I've been asking a lot of questions on here lately (my apologies to the admin for that), but I've become very worried about my future as I've had a terrible semester.

I'm a second year student currently studying mathematics at a Canadian university and as of now, I have two Cs (one in a math course) and an F on my transcript (thankfully, from a non math course). I'm very worried about how this will hurt my application to grad school (in terms of getting research experience and my transcript itself), particularly as a MSc candidate. I know I have a lot of time to make up for my mistakes (academically) this semester, but the way I see it, I'm pretty much out of options until maybe next year when my GPA (currently sitting at ~3.4-3.45) goes up, considering a lot of research opportunities at my school are based on GPA.

I am very interested in pursuing research in some areas of pure mathematics. However, like I mentioned earlier, I know for a fact my school operates research grants and applications based on GPA and seniority, thus because I:

  1. Am a second year student and do not have many higher level maths courses under my belt and;
  2. Have a mediocre GPA and;
  3. Have received lower marks for second year courses rather than first...

it is highly likely I will get rejected by the professors at my school and not get the grant.

My question now is what else can I do to help me gain experience/skills/contacts within the department at my school? My lackluster grades were a result of poor time management and I know I can do better. When I asked a similar question, I was recommended to seek professors to do informal reading with. I am still planning on doing that, however, is there anything else that I can do? I was hoping to ask one of my profs, but I ended up doing much worse in his course than I expected, so I don't know if contacting him would be reasonable anymore?

Anyway, this is a question mostly to see what I can do to redeem myself more than anything. I still have two more maths courses this coming semester I have the chance to do well in, and so far this C would be my lowest maths-related mark yet. Hopefully that doesn't completely take my out of the running.

Thanks in advance for all your help.

2 Answers 2


Honestly, you should take a step back and focus on your coursework first. Research experience is great and often necessary for graduate applications, but it's useless if you don't have good grades in upper-level classes. Focus on showing that you can do well in courses before worrying about adding research to your workload.

Also, excelling in an upper-level class is the probably the best way to connect with a professor and get a research opportunity at this point. If you can get to know a professor a little through class and office hours and impress them there, then it's much easier to ask them after the class is over about research opportunities. The key, however, is that you have to actually impress them, and no professor is going to be impressed by a C or even a B in their class.

It also helps if you are willing to work as an unpaid research assistant or similar. Getting funded positions as an undergraduate can be very difficult, especially in math since it's unlikely you will do any real work. But unpaid positions can still be very valuable and are much easier to obtain.

  • Do you think it would look badly if I spent the next year with less extra curricular activity than I am currently doing? I'm doing research in a non-math/science dept. right now, but would cutting that out for the net year fare badly on an application or CV?
    – Turra
    Dec 30, 2015 at 3:12
  • @Turra I don't think that unrelated research will be valued much, and I don't think anyone will notice if you stop doing it. Even if they do, they're much more likely to notice a mediocre grade in a math class or a lack of math research. If you can continue your current research and get all A's then go for it, but otherwise it's probably in your interest to prioritize.
    – Roger Fan
    Dec 30, 2015 at 4:06

a lot of research opportunities at my school are based on GPA.

A big reason for this is that doing research consumes a lot of resources: time, attention, mental energy, etc.

At my university, students who don't have a certain minimum GPA aren't eligible for department-funded research positions. The reason for this is that it's not in the students' best interest - if they're already doing poorly in their coursework, doing research at the same time is liable to make things a lot worse.

My lackluster grades were a result of poor time management and I know I can do better.

Great. That's what you need to do, in order to gain access to research opportunities in later semesters: show that you can manage your time, can excel in your coursework, and that a professor who takes you on as a research assistant isn't going to have to worry about you ending up on academic probation because you can't juggle it all.

For grad school applications, too, showing (by means of excellent grades in later years) that you have more than recovered from your not-so-great sophomore year will be important.

I'm not in mathematics myself, but it's my impression that mathematics (more so than most other fields) requires a lot of prerequisite knowledge before you can do meaningful research. Thus, without having done well in your coursework, including higher level courses, it is unlikely that you will be able to do meaningful research. (Even if you have done higher level coursework, some mathematicians on this site consider undergraduate research experiences to be more "experience" than "research," anyways.) See for example Is it common for an undergraduate thesis in pure mathematics to prove something new?. Perhaps one of the math users will chime in with more details.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .