I want to go to graduate school for a PhD, but as a safety I'm also considering applying to master programs in the same or related field, if my undergraduate credentials are not strong enough for top programs. Would applying to the masters program where I am also applying for a PhD send the wrong message to the school though, that I'm not sure if I want to do this for a full PhD or not? Or do they understand that people apply to masters program as a back up for if someone's PhD applications don't go well?

  • Interesting question. Some people here may be able to give insight, but have you considered asking someone at the institution directly?
    – user24098
    Dec 12, 2015 at 7:38
  • Like an administrative person or a professor? I feel talking to a professor might make it seem like I don't have confidence in my application for the PhD and perhaps weight negatively on my admission.
    – user73236
    Dec 12, 2015 at 8:49
  • I would talk to someone in graduate admissions about this, rather than a professor. That said, I don't think the idea that you hope to get in to the PhD program, but have a fallback plan, would reflect negatively on you if a professor knew about it. It seems very sensible.
    – user24098
    Dec 12, 2015 at 8:51

1 Answer 1


Applying for multiple programs is common and unlikely to reflect badly upon you. Application committees for different programs are usually made up of different members and it is highly unlikely that they will even know that you applied to both programs. The only time it might be revealed is when it goes to the administrators who send out the letters and, frankly, they couldn't care less.

Something to note, which affects both this issue and your overall considerations of a program, is that schools usually look for different things in a PhD program vs. an MA, and that affects how they conduct their admissions. At many schools, MAs are not just less-capable versions of PhD students, they are completely different type of student.

Terminal MA programs are usually unfunded, and include people who are less likely to conduct independent research. Some MA students will go on to a PhD program, but probably not at the institution where they get the MA. For this reason, MA programs at many schools are called 'cash cows' and admissions to those programs are less of a priority for the full faculty, with a lot of the sorting done by administration, focused on funding potential, and stricter considerations about things like GREs, etc.

PhD programs are research training to become academics, or at least independent researchers, and most PhDs are fully funded. Since the university is investing in you, and the faculty will be stuck with you in person for 5-10 years, and reputationally forever, the faculty care a great deal about this. Considerations like the ability to pay, and even strict measures of capacity like test scores, take a secondary role to creativity in the field, goodness of fit, and so on.

Simply put, in many schools you have to impress two different sets of people to get admitted, with overlapping but different priorities. There are idiosyncratic reasons why you may be admitted to one program and not the other, and sometimes it might even be that you get into a PhD and not an MA. (On balance, however, admissions to an MA program is more likely than a PhD, simply due to the volume of admissions.)

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .