Is it just me or are the published articles a strain on the eyes in general? Has there been(/shouldn't there be) a study on optimal font sizes for reading?

  • 1
    I really love this one. Both the question and answers are great. Is there any way to let those publishers know this problem?
    – scaaahu
    Dec 25 '12 at 6:54
  • I have this problem reading them using my kindle
    – mfadel
    Dec 25 '12 at 7:48
  • 1
    Could you give a specific example (e.g. a screenshot, or a font reference)? Without that it's hard to address the problem (perhaps different people have different journals in mind, with different fonts). Dec 25 '12 at 13:26
  • 1
    There's no quick solution, and not as long as we have print journals.
    – Suresh
    Dec 25 '12 at 15:31

This is a historical anachronism. The fonts are chosen for the print version of the journal. For a print version, if you use a smaller font, you can squeeze more text onto the same page and print the same paper on fewer pages -- which saves money. So, for print publications, the small font size arguably makes sense. However, today print is less important and the digital format is more important, but journal requirements haven't caught up to this fact.

For instance, in computer science, the ACM is a notorious offender: they require papers to use 9pt fonts, which are very small.

  • 16
    One might add that even PDF hasn't caught up to the digital age. There should be a better way to render documents for use on different media devices, and PDF ain't it.
    – Suresh
    Dec 25 '12 at 6:20
  • What's wrong with the people in charge of keeping the font at 9pt at ACM? What is the reasoning behind this?
    – Jase
    Dec 25 '12 at 7:07
  • 3
    Not clear. Journals still produce print versions, for which all these restrictions come into play. The relevant question is whether online-only journals still have strange font requirements or not.
    – Suresh
    Dec 25 '12 at 8:30
  • 3
    If research papers were written in clean LaTeX and the source was freely distributable, people could compile their own PDF files in the font size they wanted.
    – kush
    Dec 25 '12 at 13:37
  • 1
    @kush: depending on the field, many are (well, minus the “clean”): the arXiv offers LaTeX source download for almost all papers there.
    – PLL
    Apr 26 '15 at 16:46

Journal prescribed fonts haven't really caught up with the digital era. They were optimized for a time of print, where each page had a price. Unfortunately, researchers are required to use fonts specified by the publisher at a conference. But many people usually upload a more readable version on a web page or the arxiv - 11pt tends to be reasonable.


I prefer the old-fashioned way of reading papers: print it and read with text-marker, and I find the usual font sizes OK (sometimes too large when printing on A4 paper). Margins of ca. 4 cm per column are (would be) nice, though.

Monitor space is much too valuable for more than taking a glance which paper exactly I want to get from my collection. Where should I edit notes, do calculations and see graphs/images/man pages if most of the monitor is taken up by the paper?
I did print much less when I had 2 monitors, but at my new place I have only one. And anyways, no monitors can hold as much easily accessible information as a bunch of papers laid out on a large table.

(But I LaTeX my papers, so whoever wants larger fonts is welcome to rerun them with other settings).

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.