2

When I need to cite a range of pages in a source, I (well, LaTeX) write:

See Smith (2010:30–34)

Similarly, when I need to reference a range of sections, I write:

See Smith (2010:§§3.1–3.4)

For a reference of a single chapter:

See Smith (2010:ch. 3)

But today, for the first time ever, I need to reference a range of chapters. What is the proper way of doing this? My first instinct was to go with

See Smith (2010:chs. 3–6)

But then I realized that I had never seen chs. as an abbreviation of chapters, so I tried

See Smith (2010:ch. 3-6)

Which is weird because it looks like I’m talking about just one chapter. And then

See chapters 3 through 6 of Smith (2010)

Just looks unwieldy. So the questions are:

  • Is there a convention for this particular type of citation?
  • If not, what looks best to you, personally?
  • 1
    First of all, for ranges an en dash (-- in LaTeX) is preferred over a hyphen. – Federico Poloni Nov 26 '15 at 12:55
  • Yes, I know. Properly, what I write is see \citet[31--34]{smith10}, but I couldn't figure out how to render an en dash in the SE text field. – Koldito Nov 26 '15 at 14:06
1

According to Wiktionary and a number of other sites, "chs." seems to be the appropriate pluralization of the "ch." abbreviation for chapters. Note, however, that either is likely to be quite intelligible to a reader, and if the typesetters disagree with your choice, they'll surely fix it to their preferred style. In short: just use "chs." and don't worry about it.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.