2

I spent time reading a professor's papers, and I developed an idea about how to expand the professor's work. I told the professor this and got the professor's approval. Now the next job is to persuade the admission committee (adcom).

Should I tell the adcom about how I found the professor while writing my SOP (statement of purpose)? I don't see a problem with it. I would be happy if a stranger told me how they found me. So I wrote about it the first time I contacted the professor. However, the adcom is not the professor, and I'm not sure if they care or not. I think that they only care about the benefit that I will bring to the department, as well as the approval of the professor. How I reach them is not important.

But I don't have any reason to remove that part, right? At best, it will show how hard I worked to reach them. At worst, there will be nothing to lose.

My draft is as follows:

I have read some of the most recent and commonly cited papers of Professor X, starting with Paper 1 written in 2014. Among the introduced methods, I found the Method the most interesting prompting further study. I then focused on Paper 2, written with Y. Its introduction on Quanta Magazine gave me a great insight into the Method. However, there are known limitations that Prof X is keen to discern. For example, when the system undergoes rapid changes the method breaks down, the reason for this remains unclear.

My hypothesis is that the changing of the system might suggest that... (this paragraph is for showing my idea to expand the work)

A minor question: should I include this in the email to professors too? Why or why not?

  • 4
    What is the adcom? – Davidmh Nov 10 '15 at 9:26
  • 1
    Should I tell them how I find the professor in my SOP? — "Usually I just go to his office, but sometimes I look in the local coffee shop, too"? (Also, you mean "Its introduction", not "It is introduction".) – JeffE Nov 10 '15 at 9:29
  • 3
    Always use the full spelled out version of a word once before using acronyms (took me a while to figure out SOP=statement of purpose). Also what position are you applying for, a PhD student, a postdoc? – WetlabStudent Nov 10 '15 at 9:58
  • 2
    @Ooker, lesson for the future: never assume an acronym is common-knowledge. Always define it at least once. Two to five extra words will annoy no one, but leaving out such a definition can absolutely infuriate someone who doesn't know or remember it. I have even seen reviewers reject papers, without reading past the intro, due to undefined acronyms. Do not leave an acronym undefined ... ever! (there are cases where you can get away with it, but it doesn't mean you should do it). – WetlabStudent Nov 10 '15 at 15:18
  • 2
    At least in my dialect of English, the phrase "how I find the professor" usually means "how I locate the professor". It could also mean something closer to "how I discovered the professor('s work)" or "what I think of the professor", but neither of those fits your example. – JeffE Nov 10 '15 at 20:05
5

I don't know if adding this information is a good idea, but I think your current text is not. In the draft, as it stands, you are just pointing out highlights, that proofs that you have skimmed through two papers. You are not showing any hard work because you don't even need to understand the papers to say that the method is interesting and to quote limitations they themselves described. I am not saying you haven't worked hard, or that you don't understand the paper, but just that it doesn't show all that. So, it risks backfiring at you because it sounds sort of pretentious.

If you want to show deep understanding, you would need to "cook" some new knowledge, like relating several papers, or relating their work to other people's. Mind that it will be read by people not familiar with the paper, and they may not know what is your own work, and what is just regurgitating.

One tip I can give you is to try to give it a focus from some other field you are an expert in. For example, sketch out how you would like to introduce a different mathematical modelling technique (like, instead of solving a single differential equation, you model your system as a network of interacting differential equations, where the topology comes from blablabla). This will give them a reason to hire you specifically: you are not just another mini Prof. X, but someone that would be bringing in new knowledge to the group.

Just make sure you run this through your local expert, to make sure you aren't saying anything silly, or that has actually been done before.

If after doing this you believe you are adding new useful information that would make you look better in the face of the admission committee, include it; otherwise, don't.

  • Thanks for your answer. I have already thought about linking the work to other people's, and I have written in in the SOP, right after the draft. In that case, would this still sounds pretentious? – Ooker Nov 10 '15 at 10:33
  • +1 for "You are not showing any hard work because you don't even need to understand the papers to say that the method is interesting and to quote limitations they themselves described." – Ooker Nov 10 '15 at 10:42
  • 2
    @Ooker Probably no. One thing is saying "look, I skim this paper, I know a lot of stuff", and another is saying something thoughtful and intelligent to show that you know a lot of stuff. In that case, don't even add the summary of the papers. – Davidmh Nov 10 '15 at 11:05
  • Is it good to use the names of the paper as an example? My edited version is: "Regarding on my understanding on some of his most recent and commonly cited papers, such as Paper 1 and Paper 2, the method is [describe it]. It is very anologuous to the research conducted by Y Lab in Y's school, though the object of this lab is A, not B. There are known limitations that Prof X is keen to discern. For example,..." – Ooker Nov 10 '15 at 11:19

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.