7

I am working on a university project about computer vision. Part of my work requires object recognition, for which I would use cascade classifiers. These cascade classifiers need to be “taught” what an objects looks like and therefore I need a big collection (hundreds) of images. The problem is, that I cannot create enough material on my own and need to use images from the Internet.

This would usually not be a big issue, because there are a lot of academic sources for computer vision and machine learning, as well as many places for public domain and Creative Commons images, but in this case it is a little difficult.

I need photos of bird feces, which are not available in a collected manner.

On aggregated licensed data, I would cite the source and apply additional conditions if a license requests to do so. The images do not get (re-)published, but they are used to generate classifiers that the object-detection algorithm uses. I do not want to infringe copyright.

Fair use does not apply as I am from Germany. How should I optimally proceed to be on the save side?

  • I suggest to bold the sentence "The images do not get (re-)published, but they are used to generate classifiers that the object detection algorithm uses." It seems to be the core statement here. – O. R. Mapper Nov 1 '15 at 19:01
  • Flikr and Wikimedia Commons both have thousands of images that can be freely used under a Creative Commons license. – JeffE Nov 1 '15 at 23:45
  • 2
    @JeffE That is correct, but closeups of bird feces aren't the hot topic. I have found a couple of very useful photos on flickr. In case you do know a site that features lots of bird poop, I would appreciate a link. Pardon my "shitty" question. – John Nov 2 '15 at 13:00
3

I quote from the German copyright (Urheberrecht, original, English translation):

§ 15 Allgemeines

(1) Der Urheber hat das ausschließliche Recht, sein Werk in körperlicher Form zu verwerten; das Recht umfaßt insbesondere

  1. das Vervielfältigungsrecht (§ 16),
  2. das Verbreitungsrecht (§ 17),
  3. das Ausstellungsrecht (§ 18).

(2) Der Urheber hat ferner das ausschließliche Recht, sein Werk in unkörperlicher Form öffentlich wiederzugeben (Recht der öffentlichen Wiedergabe). […]


Article 15 – General

(1) The author has the exclusive right to exploit his work in material form; this right shall in particular include

  1. the right of reproduction (Article 16),

  2. the right of distribution (Article 17),

  3. the right of exhibition (Article 18).

(2) The author further has the exclusive right to communicate his work to the public in non-material form (right of communication to the public). […]

This paragraph tells you what is protected by German copyright in the first place and the only thing that you need to do for your endeavour seems to be copying/reproducing the photos, as you do not seem to distribute, exhibit or communicate them.

§ 53 Vervielfältigungen zum privaten und sonstigen eigenen Gebrauch

[…]

(2) Zulässig ist, einzelne Vervielfältigungsstücke eines Werkes herzustellen […]

  1. zum eigenen wissenschaftlichen Gebrauch, wenn und soweit die Vervielfältigung zu diesem Zweck geboten ist und sie keinen gewerblichen Zwecken dient,

  2. […]


Article 53 – Reproduction for private and other personal uses

[…]

(2) It shall be permissible to make single copies of a work […]

  1. for one’s own scientific use if and to the extent that such reproduction is necessary for the purpose and it does not serve a commercial purpose,
  2. […]

This paragraph tell you that the only thing that you need to do which might infringe copyright as assumed above (reproduction) is permissable if you do it for your own scientific use and if it is necessary (which seems to be the case).

How should I optimally proceed to be on the save side?

Check the entirety of the above paragraphs and the rest of the German copyright to ensure yourself whether there is anything that would make your endeavour illegal.

Also check whether other copyrights may apply. The Berne Convention may ease things a lot.

  • Thank you! I wasn't aware of § 53, but I will still check the other paragraphs. Still I would need to cite the source for all images, right? At least that seems to be the correct way, even for such a huge amount sources. – John Nov 1 '15 at 21:21
  • @John: I do not see any legal argument that requires you to do that. As for the academic ethics and correct citation, that’s a different issue. I suggest that you ask another question about it. – Wrzlprmft Nov 1 '15 at 21:27

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.