4

Are there any cross-platform websites to measure scientific impact of any research article? I am aware of dblp, Google Scholar and Microsoft Academic Search. Recently, ResearchGate is quite popular. However, all these are not optimal in several aspects.

For example, Google Scholar is a good platform for citation index, particularly h-index of any author; dblp is intended for most authentic, however lacks in the timely updating. ResearchGate seems to be updated mostly by individual scholars. I know that it is not possible to find a comprehensive database with authentic information contained. Thus, the criteria may be as follows: timely manner, self citation exclusion, information entered by authors or robot cross-checked by any person, and most importantly free access to scholars. (Scopus is not free.)

  • 1
    What are you asking for? A list of all the places that measure "scientific impact"? And what does "highlight the issue" mean in this context? – EnergyNumbers Oct 8 '15 at 17:04
  • 2
    Please clarify: Are you aware of any issues (list them! Define precisely what you expect of a measure of "scientific impact", because there probably is no globally accepted/useful definition.) and looking for an alternative that circumvents the issues, or are you unaware of any issues and want us to highlight them? (In case the answer is "both" - these are two different questions, so please ask them separately.) – O. R. Mapper Oct 8 '15 at 17:05
  • 3
    @Alexandros: "Google scholar is the de-facto standard for tracking citations" - given the severe distortions in Google Scholar's h-index based upon the random inclusion of undergrad works, I have not yet met anyone who would have looked seriously at Google Scholar for determining the impact of someone or something - although opinions here on Academia SE seem to differ sometimes. Google Scholar is an excellent tool for finding related work, but the "statistics" tools like citation counts seem more like a well-intended, but failed feature. – O. R. Mapper Oct 8 '15 at 21:21
  • 1
    I understand, and I agree with you that it would be a great system. Unfortunately, though, nothing similar exists at the moment (not that I know, at least). The closest match seems Orcid, which is a recent system backed up by a consortium of publishers and institutions. It is still preliminary, though, and it is still uncertain whether it will gain enough momentum to become a standard. – Federico Poloni Oct 9 '15 at 3:46
  • 2
    I have not yet met anyone who would have looked seriously at Google Scholar for determining the impact of someone or something — Hi, @O.R.Mapper. Nice to meet you. – JeffE Oct 9 '15 at 11:39
0

You have a compilation to scientific research referencing websites and networks, and some links to further information, here (post in spanish language, with automatic transation available).

  • 4
    When you post a link to your own blog, please disclose the affiliation and do not present it as a third party. – Federico Poloni May 3 '16 at 12:04
  • Thanks for the remark on the affiliation, but where did I present it as a third party? – Alfonso F R May 8 '16 at 12:17
  • Writing "here is this blog post" generically instead of "this is a post from my blog" in my view means failing to disclose your relationship and presenting it as a third party. Maybe not in lawyer's terms, but at least in spirit. – Federico Poloni May 9 '16 at 9:28
  • It could also be argued that, because I did not disclose the affiliation, I was presenting it as my own, if it was not. Spirit is hardly measurable. Anyway this discussion is off-topic. – Alfonso F R May 18 '16 at 11:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.