I am a mechanical engineering graduate student, and am working on my final project. I am doing a finite element analysis of a particular phenomenon. I was hoping to find test data of that particular phenomenon using a quick google search, and sure enough, I found some. The test data will be helpful in showing that my analysis results are accurate. I found the report on a vendor’s website. Can I reproduce the test data from this report in my final project? Per the “fair use” clause of the copyright act, since this will be used for scholarship/research (no profit involved), am I covered?

Can I also reproduce images from the report?

Added detail:

Thanks all of you for your answers! I am certainly going to cite the source of the data and images. Tom, to explain a little more about the data - it is friction coefficient data that applies to two very specific materials. Company A did the testing for Company B. Company B has posted the test report on their website (they are a vendor, and want people to know how low friction their particular material is). I want to know if I can use the friction data from the report, and one or two images from the report (properly cited). The reason I ask, is that Company A explicitly states in the report, "This document is provided on the basis of strict confidentiality. Subject to any statutory requirement, the contents must not be disclosed to a third party, without the prior consent of Company A." I know that I can contact Company A and ask, but if they do not give me the right to use the data and images... am I still ok?

2 Answers 2


The following is NOT legal advice. I am NOT an attorney. You should ALWAYS consult a competent attorney about any legal matters, including this matter.

Generally, raw data is not covered by copyright law in the US. I don't know exactly what the data you're using looks like, but if it's something akin to baseball statistics (a bunch of numbers), those can't be copyrighted (though their presentation can be). If it's just raw data, you don't even need the fair use exemption as there is no copyright protection.

As for images, those are almost certainly covered by copyright law.

Fair use is a four-prong test that is measured by a court. A good way to get a sense of whether or not your situation falls under the fair use exemption is to consult a competent attorney who can compare your situation to past rulings. Keep in mind, though, that an attorney can make an educated prediction, but cannot guarantee an outcome. The four factors considered, to give you an idea, are:

  1. the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
  2. the nature of the copyrighted work;
  3. the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
  4. the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.

While all four prongs may be considered, you do not have to meet a specific requirement for all four. It's up to the court which of the criteria matter, or don't matter, in your situation and how much.

Keep in mind also, from a pragmatic standpoint, that copyright law would only be enforced if the publisher of the data decided to file a law suit. If that's unlikely, all this discussion is moot.

Finally, you can always just send in an email and ask. Given the nature of your work, they might just want a citation. And if they give your permission, you have nothing to worry about.


@Jacob added some more details about the situation.

What struck me as interesting in the added details was the statement This document is provided on the basis of strict confidentiality. If the data is truly in need of protection, like if it is a trade secret, it might be smart to exercise some extra caution here. Having posted the data on the open Internet, the company probably could not do much to keep you from using it. However, if it's truely valuable, they may fight to protect it which could create a huge headache, to say the least.

I think I outlined why you might be able to use the data with and without fair use above. I want to add however, that does not mean you should use it without permission. Even if the data is not protected by copyright, it would be best to ask permission if for no reason other than basic courtesy.

Being turned down does not change the law. If something was not protected by copyright before you ask, it will not be protected after you ask. If something falls under fair use before you ask, it will still remain under fair use after you ask. You really have very little to lose by asking. I can tell though that you are hesitant to ask so I will suggest you do so without revealing too much information about yourself and your work. Instead of diving in with a long, detailed explanation of your research, put your toe in the water with some basic details and see how they react.

For all you know, they might be interested in your work. Since it seems like your area of expertise, this might even lead to something more like a job interview. There is a lot of potential upside.

I don't want to say too much more about whether or not the specific data is covered by copyright because this is not a place to get legal advice and I am not someone to give it. But in general, if you put the raw coefficient numbers in the prose of your work, you are probably safe regardless of fair use. If you want to copy any photos, graphics, or detailed descriptions of the numbers, you'll have to do so under fair use and/or with permission.

  • 8
    This is a fine answer, except: The only way to really know if you fall under the fair use exemption is to consult a competent attorney who will compare your situation to past rulings. This is not really true. A lawyer can't tell you in advance whether a certain use is fair use. Nobody can, because the criteria are extremely vague. The only way to be 100% certain is to get sued and see the result of the lawsuit.
    – user1482
    Oct 3, 2015 at 18:28
  • 2
    @BenCrowell Good point. I have made an edit to make it clear an attorney cannot guarantee an outcome. Do you think my wording is accurate?
    – user16092
    Oct 3, 2015 at 18:45
  • 2
    Cool, that seems better IMO.
    – user1482
    Oct 3, 2015 at 23:35
  • @Jacob, to this fine legalistic advice one should add that from an academic honesty point of view, you must cite the source of whatever data and images you end up including, regardless of whether your use is legal under copyright law; otherwise you are committing plagiarism. (You probably know that but I thought I would mention it just in case.)
    – Dan Romik
    Oct 4, 2015 at 17:06

(Disclaimer: I'm from Europe and speak mainly about [Central] European copy right legislation). Also here, facts (friction coefficient of xxx is y) are not subject to copyright. But collections of facts (such as an encyclopedia, or a table of friction coefficients) are, given it was enough work to put together that collection.

One way to be sure you can use the report is to ask the company. Being able to write "with kind permission of company" in the caption of the reproduced image does immediately answer all possible copyright questions anyone and in particular any examiner of the thesis may have.
And, who knows, they may be very interested in knowing about graduates who work in the field...

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .