July and October seem to be the months with the highest number of papers submitted, and August the month with the lowest number, in average. I wonder if there is a correlation between the month of submission on the arXiv and citations gained, regardless from other factors.

The plot shows the number of submissions per month [source: http://arxiv.org/stats/monthly_submissions ]

I can speculate at least one reason why this correlation is possible. I imagine that, for example, in August and December most of researchers (at least in Europe and Northern America) are on vacation, and therefore less people are following new submissions in these months. Perhaps this could result in a different rate of citation, just because papers submitted in this period have not gained a critical mass of "early" readers?

Is there, in your opinion, a correlation between submission date and citations gained by a paper on the arXiv? Extra question: is there a correlation instead between publication date (on a journal) and citations?

  • Related: arxiv.org/abs/0712.1037 – Corvus Aug 7 '15 at 21:54
  • 1
    Is there any variance information, or just means? Without variance, effect size can't be estimated, rendering speculation meaningless. – jakebeal Aug 8 '15 at 0:20
  • @jakebeal means and variance? I just plotted the total number of submissions per month. My question regards the correlation between date and citations. Citations are not in the plot. – sintetico Aug 8 '15 at 2:45
  • 1
    The variation in publication rate among months doesn't seem to be very large, so unless there is a very strong correlation you won't detect it. – vonbrand Aug 27 '15 at 23:27
  • 1
    @vonbrand Thank you for your comment, which is the first useful. – sintetico Aug 30 '15 at 21:53

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.