The plot shows the number of submissions per month (source) on arXiv:

July and October seem to be the months with the highest number of papers submitted, and August the month with the lowest number, in average. I wonder if there is a correlation between the month of submission on the arXiv and citations gained, regardless from other factors.

I can speculate at least one reason why this correlation is possible. I imagine that, for example, in August and December most of researchers (at least in Europe and Northern America) are on vacation, and therefore less people are following new submissions in these months. Perhaps this could result in a different rate of citation, just because papers submitted in this period have not gained a critical mass of "early" readers?

Is there a correlation between submission date and citations gained by a paper on the arXiv?

  • 1
    Related: arxiv.org/abs/0712.1037
    – Corvus
    Aug 7, 2015 at 21:54
  • 1
    Is there any variance information, or just means? Without variance, effect size can't be estimated, rendering speculation meaningless.
    – jakebeal
    Aug 8, 2015 at 0:20
  • 1
    @sintetico Your question is predicated on the existence of a significant correlation: "Perhaps this [correlation] could result in a different rate of citation..." If the correlation is not significant, then a) it undermines your speculation and b) you can delete the first 2/3 of the question.
    – jakebeal
    Aug 8, 2015 at 3:09
  • 3
    The variation in publication rate among months doesn't seem to be very large, so unless there is a very strong correlation you won't detect it.
    – vonbrand
    Aug 27, 2015 at 23:27
  • 1
    @Wrzlprmft For a complex and coupled system like this, I don't think that's a safe assumption at all. For example, the totals might be highly affected by a small number of high-weight events like outages, policy changes, or high-salience external events.
    – jakebeal
    Jan 7 at 16:06


You must log in to answer this question.

Browse other questions tagged .