15

I just tried submitting my first paper to arXiv. To be honest, this hasn't been an unqualifiedly fun experience.

One reason for rejection was that my paper contained line numbers. I am a bit confused as to why arXiv would reject papers for containing line numbers. One reason for me to submit to the arXiv was to potentially get comments on the paper - and it's a lot easier to comment on a paper that has line numbers. It's easier to discuss "lines 95-105" than "the third paragraph on page 5, not counting the table and its caption". I really like line numberings in papers I'm supposed to review.

Can anyone tell me why arXiv does not allow numbered lines in submissions?

(A quick internet search didn't turn up anything useful. )

16
  • 11
    Perhaps, the editorial team at arXiv values readability more than maintainability. Commented Jul 25, 2015 at 19:17
  • 4
    I've been an ArXiv moderator (in CS) for several years, and I've never heard of such a policy.
    – JeffE
    Commented Jul 25, 2015 at 23:00
  • 12
    I would guess it is related to the principle that arXiv preprints should generally meet the content and formatting standards for journal papers. You wouldn't see a paper in a journal with line numbers. Commented Jul 26, 2015 at 0:45
  • 4
    @JeffE: I can confirm that this exists as I have accidentally left on the line numbers myself once and had to resubmit the paper. However, I cannot cite a policy for this.
    – Wrzlprmft
    Commented Jul 26, 2015 at 10:14
  • 7
    I respectfully disagree with the statement "line numbers decrease readability". Commented Oct 6, 2015 at 2:39

2 Answers 2

8

In my experience, it is much more useful to give some context (a few words, name of the theorem, ...) to any editorial suggestions than line numbers. My documents exist as LaTeX source, so line numbers in some printed version don't correlate at all with line numbers in the text I currently work on. A few words of context are easy to search for in a text editor, line numbers would require referring to the printout to find same first. Besides, text changes (paragraphs get rewritten, shuffled around, new chapters are added, a new example appears, ...).

2
  • 4
    This. Specially if you get several comments, the moment you address the first one, the rest of the line numbers go down the toilet.
    – Davidmh
    Commented Oct 12, 2015 at 9:30
  • Hmm, maybe the default line numbering should be from the bottom. If one does changes in the beginning, the remaining numbered issues later in the document should stay numbered the same... Commented Mar 5 at 18:14
3

It may be a way of discouraging authors from submitting galley proofs, which are typeset in the final format of the journal but generally have line numbers.

4
  • 5
    Maybe, but why? I have recently reviewed a manuscript that was in this format, and I found the line numbers quite helpful for reading and taking notes. So, why would they want to discourage authors from submitting these so-called "galley proofs"? Commented Oct 11, 2015 at 19:15
  • 1
    For copyright reasons. Posting the content of the paper as a preprint is (usually) OK, but not using the graphical identity of the journal. Commented Oct 11, 2015 at 19:43
  • But such a restriction would probably not apply to fields where it is customary to use the final layout already for the initial manuscript. Commented Oct 11, 2015 at 19:51
  • 1
    I would also find that logical. However, the moderation page arxiv.org/help/moderation of arXiv states that: "arXiv cannot accept PDFs that have been downloaded from a publisher's website and contain a copyright statement". Commented Oct 11, 2015 at 20:12

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .