arxiv has an endorsement system, where

during the submission process, we may require authors who are submitting papers to an archive or subject class for the first time to get an endorsement from another arXiv author

However, I submitted a paper to arxiv for the first time, and I was not asked for an endorsement. The relevant help page says:

During the initial deployment of the system, we may also give automatic endorsements to submitters from known academic institutions.

So this may be what happened to me (I have a verified email address from an academic institution), but this seems weird, because it says “during the initial deployment of the system”, and this is dated 2004.

So: does someone know what is the current endorsement policy for arxiv?

  • 1
    You are quoting a current page and ask what the current policy is? Commented Oct 17, 2012 at 14:17
  • 11
    They are being deliberately vague, to give themselves flexibility. For example, some departments are very lax about making people unpaid visiting scholars. That's justifiable: it often offers nothing but library privileges, and one can make a case that it's good to extend library access to just about anyone, even crackpots. However, it's not clear that arXiv posting should be treated similarly. If the arXiv promised that academic affiliation always guaranteed an endorsement, then they would have to explain what counts as a "real" academic affiliation and why. It's easiest to be vague. Commented Oct 17, 2012 at 15:04
  • 1
    @AnonymousMathematician to be fair, there's plenty of crackpot content on arxiv anyway, even with these rules in place :)
    – F'x
    Commented Oct 17, 2012 at 15:06
  • 3
    Incidentally, I view the vagueness as a feature, rather than a bug. The downside is that it allows a small potential for abuse of the endorsement system, but I've never heard of it causing problems for anything I'd consider to be legitimate research. The upside is that the vagueness protects the arXiv from an endless stream of legalistic complaints from people outside of mainstream research. Commented Oct 17, 2012 at 15:08
  • 2
    Regarding the crackpot content, that's true. There's a trade-off here, where you want to minimize the junk without actually causing a burden for anything serious. I imagine that completely eliminating all crackpot papers would require a slower, more intrusive, or more error-prone system for everyone else. :-/ Commented Oct 17, 2012 at 15:11

1 Answer 1


I believe the help page describes the current endorsement policy. You may also have fallen into the category described by "We may give some people automatic endorsements based on topic, previous submissions, and academic affiliation."

As I understand it, most people are in that category and never see the endorsement system in action. In practice, it seems to get applied to cranks and to people who look like they might possibly be cranks (e.g., people with no academic affiliation, or who are writing on controversial topics).

  • 3
    This is also my experience. Commented Oct 17, 2012 at 14:09
  • 2
    Some people (having affiliation) submit using their webmail id, endorsement is required in that case. Some universities do not yet provide official email ids. Commented Oct 17, 2012 at 14:22

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .