0

I'm in the process of writing my first paper as a PhD student and was wondering if I could get some general advice regarding the following:

  1. How many Journals to consider submitting a manuscript to and how much impact factor plays a role here. Some say aim high as possible.
  2. How much time should I spend actually writing the paper? Do I continue working on other projects at the same time as writing the paper?
  3. What other considerations should I keep in mind after submitting the manuscript? e.g. should I be writing up another manuscript for another journal-just in case?

I would be very grateful to hear about other people's experiences, etc with their first publication. Of course,I've read a lot of things on the internet and I've spoken to my supervisors too but I believe you can never learn too much. My project in the mathematical sciences with applications in biology/medicine.

Thanks.

EDIT: I found the following links very useful: one, two

  • 4
    Have you asked your advisor these questions? – scaaahu Jun 27 '15 at 7:13
  • 7
    May I suggest this is where your advisor should earn his/her pay? ;-) Previous experience publishing in the same field should prove invaluable. Previous experience should also be important for your point #2. I certainly would continue on other things while waiting, but precisely what is his purview. – ALAN WARD Jun 27 '15 at 7:15
  • @ ALAN WARD & @scaaahu, Thanks for your comments-I've edited my post slightly. I have spoken to my supervisors but I just want to hear from the perspective of a PhD student as well as from other experienced researchers out there. – John_dydx Jun 27 '15 at 7:18
  • 2
    What do you mean by "how many" journals to consider? – Tobias Kildetoft Jun 27 '15 at 8:28
  • 1
    Take a look at this question, for instance: academia.stackexchange.com/q/18148/19607 – Kimball Jun 27 '15 at 10:55
2

A Professor here.

  1. In general, yes, aim as high as possible. In practice, I do an educated guess as to which journal to send it to after seeing the final product/paper. If the student is capable and motivated, then I would work with the student to get the paper into the best journal.
  2. As much time as possible. Papers only get better over time. There are always avenues to improve it, technically or presentation wise. This is where your supervisor's experience is critical. Only he/she will be able to push your paper to the required standard and also steer you away from pitfalls.
  3. Many directions here. You could beef up the paper with new results, incorporate more assumptions or proof the general case :) Alternatively, you can work on a new problem or a related problem. Problems tend to reveal themselves as you dig deeper. All my students start on a new/related problem after they submit a paper. They might choose to go on a holiday first though.

All the best ...

  • Thanks so much for your insight, I've learnt a lot from those few lines. – John_dydx Jun 27 '15 at 10:01

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.