-3

Background: Five years ago, I obtained a Master's Degree from a top 10 American university in the Social Sciences. I was a novice in academia, only one year post completing my Bachelor's degree, and simply not yet ready for the rigors of professional academia. I had virtually no quantitative background from my Bachelor's degree, but after my first semester during my Master's program, I became interested in quantitative analysis, and registered for a doctoral level course in quantitative analysis. I was simply not able to keep up with the course, and I received a C-, and my performance in my two remaining classes for the semester was negatively affected, and I earned a B- and B+. For my final semester, I got my act together and earned three solid A's, including in two very quantitatively oriented courses. I went on to pursue a second master's degree in a foreign school where, although by no means as prestigious as the first, I had a 4.0 GPA. However, I am quite confident that my low GPA of a 3.33 from the first Master's will immediately kill any chance I have of receiving an admissions from American schools, which essentially means that one poor performance five years, at a time when I was an entirely different individual, will forever preclude me from pursuing my life's dreams. I do not believe that it is in any way immoral to want send the transcript of my second master's degree, which I feel better represents who I am and what I am capable of, though obviously I am well aware that this is not allowed.

I am not trying to avoid responsibility for my academic performance, I am simply looking to pursue my life without being kept back by one poor performance five years ago.

Questions

  • Is it possible to request from my first university to have my degree revoked and registration cancelled in a legal, open, and transparent manner?
  • Is there any way that I can, once again, legally and by the book, not be forced to send in a transcript which will assuredly destroy my chances of being accepted or looked upon as series student?
9
  • 3
    If you realize it was a mistake 5 years ago, so will the application committee, especially if you describe it in your letter. I also dont see how having your degree revoked in an 'open and transparent manner' will solve your problem, since that will most likely follow you as someone who had their degree revoked. Jun 15, 2015 at 23:42
  • 10
    You probably cannot do this the way that you propose... because even if your degree is revoked [sic], you still would have attended the college, and have a transcript. "Moving forward" and "lessons learned" and "see how I'm doing better now" are the points that could be made. Trying to avoid sending those transcripts would generate all kinds of trouble... including potential future revocation of future degrees, due to fraud, ... which would not be happy. Jun 15, 2015 at 23:51
  • 8
    @user4050: For US universities, a typical requirement is "send a transcript from every university you have ever attended", or "every university from which you have received a degree". If you intentionally omit a transcript, you have falsified your application. That's bad.. Jun 16, 2015 at 0:24
  • 9
    @user4050: You can think what you like. I repeat that it is my considered opinion that if an application states that transcripts from every university must be submitted, then anyone who intentionally fails to do so has committed academic misconduct and may suffer the corresponding consequences. I do not think I am alone in this opinion. Jun 16, 2015 at 2:36
  • 4
    Indeed, Nate Eldredge is not alone. Just a few days ago I was advising my math PhD student, and the topic of CVs came up (i.e., I said she needed one). She has a 2012 BA in math and a 2005 BA in theater, and she asked whether she should put the latter on the CV, because then it would become clear that she had seven years of non-academic employment. My answer: yes, a CV is not tailored but rather a comprehensive description of your academic record. Jobs at the hardware store don't belong there, but degrees do. Omitting parts of your academic record is giving false information. Jun 16, 2015 at 2:49

1 Answer 1

21

It is not a crime to fail to provide information that graduate programs ask for. However, surely by "illegal" you mean "against the rules of the university and program you're applying to". In that case my answer is no: not sending information to admissions personnel which is a required part of your application and because you think it would jeopardize your admissions chances is both against the rules and clearly unethical. I'm sorry, there's no magic wand to wave to change that situation.

Your hope that with suitable incantations you can perform such an outright academic dishonesty makes me question your academic maturity and suitability for a PhD program. Conversely, if you had those things you might realize that you are being melodramatic and your situation is not as grave as you seem to think.

Five years ago, I obtained a Master's Degree from a top 10 American university in the Social Sciences. I was a novice in academia, only one year post completing my Bachelor's degree, and simply not yet ready for the rigors of professional academia.

I'm sorry, but my eyes are rolling already. When you started a master's degree you'd been in academia for what, 16 years? Hadn't you been taking classes and getting grades for the vast majority of your entire life? In that you had a bachelor's degree, how were you less experienced than anyone else who is starting a master's program? If you were not a serious student during your undergraduate years, you need to take some ownership for that: it's nobody else's fault.

However, I am quite confident that my low GPA of a 3.33 from the first Master's will immediately kill any chance I have of receiving an admissions from American schools,

I'm quite confident that you're painting far too bleak a picture. A 3.33 GPA in a master's program is indeed a lower than average one. But it doesn't kill anything, especially since you got a 4.0 GPA in a different program.

which essentially means that one poor performance five years, at a time when I was an entirely different individual, will forever preclude me from pursuing my life's dreams.

My eyes are really rolling now. What you're saying is both factually incorrect -- no one is ever "forever precluded" from pursuing an academic degree, and your situation is not even an especially tough one to bounce back from -- and really annoying: according to your own description you had more than one poor performance, and you were not "an entirely different individual". Grow up: you had a period of relatively poor (not failing, nothing burned down, you got your degree...) performance. Acknowledge this, and move on.

I do not believe that it is in any way immoral to want send the transcript of my second master's degree, which I feel better represents who I am and what I am capable of, though obviously I am well aware that this is not allowed.

Of course it's not immoral to send the transcript of your second master's degree. You must do that. You must also send the transcript of your first master's degree, which is presumably what you're asking about. And for a third time, my eyes are rolling: doing what is not allowed by a program in order to gain entry to a program is immoral...as you clearly know. You're asking whether there is some penance you can do to nullify this immoral act. Nope.

I am not trying to avoid responsibility for my academic performance,

That is exactly what you're trying to do, or rather asking whether it is possible to try to do.

I am simply looking to pursue my life without being kept back by one poor performance five years ago.

Then get over it. Apply for the programs that you want, at a wide range of schools, and see what happens. Write a personal statement which acknowledges the substandard performance and explains how you've moved on to further success and found clarity in what you want to do. I think it's very likely that you'll get in somewhere. If you don't, you can always enroll in a non-degree program taking individual courses and doing very well in them. Doing that for a few years is the academically acceptable way of laundering your checkered past.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .